This story is unavailable.

While I understand the thinking… one potential all-star, a stable steady player(Jackson), and a developmental player (Giles) like others I think you have to take Monk. Not only would you be drafting two athletic freaks who already spent a year adjusting to each other but I think that it would’ve given SAC relevance and in time a Wall-Beal eque backcourt with smaller bodies.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.