Digital Extremism may not be the droid your looking for

Shock and awe tactics may seem like the only way to hit the largest audience for your content — but, could there be another, more satisfying way?


Test this theory for yourself!

Content with extreme headlines and or imagery attracts your attention more than other content in the same feed!

Check out Huffington Post. They really put the headline and content image at the forefront and are experts at grabbing attension, even when some of the content is boring as hell.

With that is mind, would we be right to assume that if we dedicate more time than we have in the past to THE HEADLINE and the imagery we will see higher read numbers? Will we have higher engagement? Very interested to hear you thoughts on this.

Platforms such as Medium are very light (quick and easy) publishing platforms where imagery and headlines will always remain a big part of the story. But there’s something more interesting going on here. Content consumers (looking for a better term here, can anyone help?) are often consuming, firstly with their eyes, a huge list of content before settling on something to actually spend their valuable time on. Once they have decided, that’s certainly not the end of the story — oh no. Within seconds of starting they can be turned off and move on. We are a fickly bunch! It’s just too easy/so easy to do isn’t it? off we trot to the next image and headline that pricks our interest.


From experience, I am noticing that content that I have spent more time on developing the headline and choosing the right headline gets more readers but has very little effect (if any) on engagement.

We have to ask ourselves, what is more important, readers or engaged readers? Are 100 readers better than 10 engaged readers? Lurkers or conversationists? Interested or not interested?

Email me when JimRoweSocialMedia publishes or recommends stories