You’re way off the mark here.
Matt McGuirl
1

Thanks for responding Matt ☺

This article is an attempt to consider one possible way we might organize society when all human needs can be met autonomously. (I.e. nobody would be trading labor for the product of another’s labor).

Edit: I just realized you were responding to a highlight. My bad. Yes, you’re absolutely right.

I had the concept of the invisible hand in mind when writing that. That being the maintenance of an equilibrium between supply and demand. In that context, I explored other possible ways that we could achieve that same equilibrium.

Nonetheless, you are right about the purpose of money. Thanks for clearing that up ☺

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.