Comparing AI-generated images two years apart — 2022 vs. 2024.
I have been using various AI Image Generators occasionally since the Summer of 2022 — mostly Midjourney, Stable Diffusion, DALL-E, and Leonardo AI, though I did not use them as often as most enthusiasts. The benefit I enjoyed was mainly in generating the illustrations and background images for my lecture and presentation slides. It is lame, I know. But it provides me an opportunity to keep observing the development of such tools.
AI toolkits are evolving like rockets. The quality of AI-generated images has gone from OK to jaw-dropping in only 2 years. How far did we go exactly? A side-by-side comparison will tell.
I dug out some images I generated in Midjourney in 2022–2023 and used the same prompts to regenerate them in the latest version (v6) of Midjourney. You be the judge. BTW, as you can see, I am not a big fan of long and sophisticated prompts. That’s just me.
In both v2 and v6, they are all cool, as long as it is steampunk. I actually like the vague and dreamy silhouette in v2. The quality and details in v6 are stunning.
Midjourney v2 knew nothing about modern architectural drawings. What it knew resembled the collage of lines and shades taken from drawings it learned from, nothing else. Architecture? Not even close. In v6, it can do architecture drawing quite well but still lacks the basic understanding of a reasonable spatial layout and requirements. For example, where is the toilet? And the openings are either missing or misplaced.
Kandinsky would have killed me. But I like both of them. I think kids love them, too.
Midjourney v2 was horrible — quite an impressionism. In v6, the layout of subjects, image quality, and rendering effects is fantastic. BUT aren’t there too many ebony keys? The reflections on ivory keys are too much.
The details in v6 is crazy… WOW. The composition is a bit messy, though.
I have always been curious about how Midjourney expresses “shimmering light.” Quite satisfied with v6.
Cyborg vegetation is a subject that I have been investigating in recent years, from imagination to implementation. In v2 the composition was simple, way too simple. In v6 the composition is sophisticated and a bit too overfull. The contrast of the image can be further improved.
I guess Midjourney v2 din’t know how to generate airbags, but it is resolved in v6. The translucent airbag petals are beautiful!
You can see how frustrating it was if you wanted to generate a poster design in v2. The inability to generate non-English text is still a shortcoming in v6.
The definition of “cute” in v2 totally went wrong. The rabbits were like characters in The Addams Family.
I still remember the hyperactive reactions, if not ecstasy, of the world toward AI Generative Images in the Summer of 2022. Now, when I see the vintage images done by v2 in 2022, I can’t help but wonder why.
The v3 images were like…hmm…it only caught the theme. On the other hand, in the v6 images I didn’t expect such an exquisite quality of the overall image and the crack. AI-assisted rendering is definitely an exciting future.
I thought colored pencil meant dry colored pencil, but the first image by v6 looks like water-soluble colored pencil or watercolor.
The following images were generated in v5.1 or newer versions, which showed muuuuuuch better quality than v2 and v3. The main difference between v5.1 and v6 is the accuracy and integrity of the interpretations of the prompt.
IMHO, Midjourney v6 is qualified as an image generator (or interpreter) for professional applications in most cases, no matter how bad your prompts are.