What a fascinating article, it claims to be factual, yet seem to be just as blind to the context of 2016 as Clinton remains.
You start by offering her popular vote count as evidence for her popularity. Yet, polls show her to be an unpopular choice. The voting patterns, particularly due to the “if you’re not with us you’re a fascist working against us” Zeitgeist that swept through the Democrats mileau at the election leaves this evidence not to say she’s popular or liked, only that she’s better than Trump. A great deal of other measures you mention have flaws as well.
Let’s stop parading ideology and opinion around as science.