Your logical fallacies are at work again Mr. Fischer. Let me refute your points one by one, try to keep up.

1. False. Those were actual incidents fitting the description of “Terrorism” if we want to include all domestic violance for all things, the numbers are much higher. Interesting that you should mention black on black crimes, because statistically whites committed more terrorist acts in this country than blacks, check out those links again.
2. Terrorism is by definition — “the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims”. It’s in the dictionary, you should look it up. I know English is probably your first language, but the meaning of a word doesn’t change whenever you want to. For example, there’s no mentioning of “planned and financed by a massive, international worldwide terrorist group” as the definition. So by your original statement, my refutation is standing quite well.
3. Well I thought my point was pretty clearly stated, but perhaps you have trouble understanding. Let me explain it again. My point was that you were factually wrong about “all the terrorism” being from one group of people. And whether it was yellow people, white people, pink people, if any one of those people committed acts that qualified as “terrorism in this country” your statement is FACTUALLY INCORRECT. As such, my point stands.

Though I must thank you for calling me a racist, that statement is so many levels of ironic hilarity that I don’t even know where to begin, quite the gem.