Yes. The article is capitalizing on the “brogrammers only” fact without ever even caring to understand why this happens. Which is what I was trying to bring attention to. It simply abuses a flammable topic in cheap tactics to bait clicks and antagonizes an entire industry along the way. It just assumes the situation is the way it is because white males are all evil bastards with an agenda. It offers nothing but antagonism because it’s easy, requires no actual investigation or thought, and gets clicks. Read my post again and you’ll see I’m happy to address the actual issue (which I guessed could be unequal access to education) instead. I know the story from the other side, and it’s excruciatingly hard to hire non-white non-males when they are barely represented on the market, and I’m tired of these posts that don’t care for anything but sounding emancipated yet being nothing but malignant.