“Here’s the bottom line. We’ve got to keep our country safe. You look at what’s happening. We’ve got to keep our country safe. You look at what’s happening in Germany, you look at what’s happening last night in Sweden. Sweden, who would believe this. Sweden. They took in large numbers. They’re having problems like they never thought possible. You look at what’s happening in Brussels. You look at what’s happening all over the world. Take a look at Nice. Take a look at Paris. We’ve allowed thousands and thousands of people into our country and there was no way to vet those people. There was no documentation. There was no nothing. So we’re going to keep our country safe.”
That’s the full context of the comment. He was clearly talking about immigration and crime, but he was also very specific that something happened “last night in Sweden.” It is not “fake news.” It is correct to say he was referencing something that did not happen. Since he had to subsequently clarify his remarks, it is not “fake news” to question the validity of an incident in Sweden. Your use of the term “fake news” is becoming watered down to where it is now meaningless.