This story is unavailable.

Why is it that anyone who is not 100% in the Al Franken wing of the Global Warming camp gets classified as a “denier” or “anti-science”?

Why can’t the discussion simply take proposals to their logical conclusion and include all of the factors, not just the ones that either of the sides would like to include?

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.