Population Collapse Imminent

The total fertility rate across the developed world is at around 1.5 children per woman thus far below replacement level which is 2.1 children per woman. Population predictions are premised on existing population data and current fertility rates. As such a steady but gentle decline is foretold.

This is not, however, what will happen. What will happen is an exponential population collapse. Let me explain why.

As most developed countries have been subjected to more than six decades of covert chemical and biological depopulation methods the number of children born from year to year has shrunk. This is why we now have inverted population pyramids, that is to say population structures or profiles with more old people than young. This is of course considered by demographers and statisticians in their population predictions.

What is not considered is that each generation entering their reproductive years is more sterile than the previous generation. People born from 1950 to 1970 are sterile to the tune of 10 to 15%. People born from 1970 to 1990, and who are now in their prime reproductive years, are sterile to the tune of 20 to 30%. And people born from 1990 to 2010 are sterile to the tune of 40 to 60%.

Population predictions, however, are based on existing fertility data, thus on 10 to 15% sterility. This means that with each generation not only is the number of men and women smaller, but more of them are also sterile.
In a population with a sterility rate of 20% (thus 2 out 10 people being sterile, which is the case with the generation that has just concluded its reproductive years) the remaining 80% fertile women would have to have enough children to compensate for the 20% that cannot have children. Thus, to keep the population stable, a people with a 20% infertility rate would have to have a total fertility rate of 2.6 children per woman to make up for the 20% who are infertile. With a current total fertility rate of 1.5 children per woman the developed world is short 1.1 children for every woman and as a result the population is declining rapidly but the decline is masked by heavy immigration.

In a population with a sterility rate of 40% (thus 4 out of 10 people being sterile, which is the case with the generation that is now in its reproductive years) the remaining 60% fertile women would have to have enough children to compensate for the 40% that cannot have children. Thus, to keep the population stable, a people with a 40% infertility rate would have to have a total fertility rate of 3.5 children per woman. Since that is not the case anywhere in the developed world the population has started collapsing and governments are desperately trying to compensate for the rapid population loss in order to meet its social obligations and to keep the economy from collapsing along with the population. There is now a deficit of two children for every woman throughout the developed world. In other words every woman in the developed world gives birth to two children fewer than needed to keep the population stable, hence the population has started collapsing.

In a population with a sterility rate of 60% (thus 6 out of 10 people being sterile, which will be the case with the generation that begins its reproductive years in this and in the next decade) the remaining 40% fertile women would have to have enough children to compensate for the 60% that cannot have children. Thus, to keep the population stable, a people with a 60% infertility rate would have to have a total fertility rate of 5.2 children per woman. We have entered a time period when every woman throughout the developed world gives birth to 3.1 fewer children than necessary to keep the population stable and this spells a catastrophic population collapse that cannot be accommodated by any economic system, not even communism, which is why the international system is attempting to bring in huge waves of migrants from the Middle East where the population is still growing rapidly. In this fashion they hope to stabilize the population throughout the Middle East by taking people out of the region and transplanting them in the developed world to make up for the 3.1 children per woman deficit and thus stabilize the population of the West as well.

Westerners having rejected the heavy migration from Muslim countries engineered by the international system they now have to boost their fertility rates to 5.2 children per woman if they want to save themselves from extinction and economic disaster.

If people were healthy it would be no problem to increase fertility to 5.2 children per woman in order to keep the population stable at current numbers or to about 4 children per woman in order to engineer a smooth decline to sustainable levels, which requires the gradual reduction of current population levels to about half the existing numbers by the end of the 21st century. But we do not have a healthy population. The genetic and intellectual endowment of people throughout the developed world is damaged beyond repair and as a result those who can still have children are too feeble and in many cases too sick to be able to conceive and raise four to six children per woman. One would have to be in perfect health to pull this off. One would also need to start having children in the early twenties and the first birth throughout the western world now happens after age 30, which is rather late to be able to give birth to six children by the time a woman reaches 40 years and her reproductive years come to an end.

A further impediment to such high fertility rates is the old age dependency burdens, which will reach 60% by 2050. The few remaining able-bodied men and women will not only have to keep society afloat they would also have to care for twice the number of old people that we now have. Yet we cannot even cope with 30% old age dependency rates let alone with 60%. And if that’s not bad enough on top of growing old age dependency rates there is a growing proportion of the population on disability due to being poisoned from the moment of conception by food, beverages, cosmetic and consumer products adulterated with depopulation poisons courtesy of our own governments, the UN system and the military-industrial complex.

I am not a mathematician but a rough calculation that considers shrinking generations and diminishing fertility rates gives only one result, namely a rapidly collapsing population that will see the population of any and all developed nations that have used covert chemical and biological depopulation methods since 1950 decrease by half every 25 years for at least the next half century.

Absent heavy immigration, the US, for instance, will shrink from the current 320 million to 160 million by 2050 and to a measly 80 million or even less by 2075 even if all covert methods of depopulation are phased out by 2020, because I have forced our politicians to do so.

If the covert chemical and biological depopulation methods stay in place for another ten years the end result will be population extinction.

Population extinction is already a possibility if our reproductive systems do not recover once covert chemical and biological depopulation toxins are removed. If the damage is epigenetic, that is to say caused by external or environmental factors that switch genes on and off, and irreversible then the population will decline by 80 to 90% by the end of the 21st century and nothing and no one will be able to bring back these lost genetic lineages.

This is what awaits the developed world where the depopulation program has proceeded primarily by covert chemical methods of depopulation through food and beverages adulterated with endocrine disruptors. What will happen in the developing world will be far worse because there the program started much later but primarily by virtue of biological methods of depopulation through adulterated vaccines. And by this method the sterilization of the population may well be irreversible because it is done by directly reprogramming genes to make reproduction impossible.

I suspect that the developing world will experience a far more sudden population collapse than the developed world.

The entire world may soon look like Easter Island.