Rationalism vs. Empiricism

What’s it about?

The dispute between rationalism and empiricism concerns the extent to which we are dependent upon sense experience in our effort to gain knowledge.

Rationalists claim that there are significant ways in which our concepts and knowledge are gained independently of sense experience.

Empiricists claim that sense experience is the ultimate source of all our concepts and knowledge.

Rationalists generally develop their view in two ways:

First, they argue that there are cases where the content of our concepts or knowledge outstrips the information that sense experience can provide.

Second, they construct accounts of how reason in some form or other provides that additional information about the world.

Empiricists present complementary lines of thought.

First, they develop accounts of how experience provides the information that rationalists cite, insofar as we have it in the first place. (Empiricists will at times opt for skepticism as an alternative to rationalism: if experience cannot provide the concepts or knowledge the rationalists cite, then we don’t have them.)

Second, empiricists attack the rationalists’ accounts of how reason is a source of concepts or knowledge.

~ Rationalism vs. Empiricism / The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy