This is a typical response from someone who cannot respond to the contents of the argument so they resort to “oh the source is leftwing/rightwing agitprop”.
Actually, you didn’t read what wrote. My POINT was that the drills you say weren’t reported by the press actually were. I cited what *I* generally read so as to inform you that the drills had been reported in one of those outlets, which you said hadn’t happened.
But, regardless, you called me a liar by implication. So, we’re done.