Harvey Weinstein and the Death of Liberal America
Ash Sharp


The Hollywood Elite, who has spent decades lecturing us about…..well, everything you list, is now exposed to lack any moral authority at all to lecture anyone about anything.

Meryl Streep needs to stop thinking about how immoral Trump is, and consider the fact that Trump is possibly more moral than she is. (Or, maybe it’s a tie. I’m still wrapping my head around this one.)

Same goes for George and Ben and Brad and Hilary and Bill and Barack. If we’re deplorables, well, welcome to the club. Go sit over there in the corner. Here, wipe the chairs down with antibacterial before you sit.

But….here’s a thought. We’re all talking now about how Harvey would discriminate against anyone that would publicize his sleaze. But…..there have been no shortage of rumors, for a good two decades or more, that Harvey would also discriminate against anyone that wasn’t a warrior for social justice causes; that to get a good role, you needed to not just donate to the “correct” causes, as defined by Saint Harvey, but you needed to publicly advocate for them as well.

And, funny thing, although this guy does not appear to be a sexual sleaze, it’s been rumored for…..well, that same two decades or more, that if you weren’t an out-there liberal, THIS GUY would discriminate against you too:

Steven Spielberg

Think about that, for a moment. If two of the three or four most powerful power brokers in Hollywood were known to be actively discriminating against actors and actresses who weren’t moonbat-liberal……..is it possible, or even probable, that many of those actors and actresses really AREN’T moonbat liberal? That many of them are really centrist, or even conservative, but were simply putting their own careers and wallets ahead of their political views.

Should be interesting to find out, over time.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.