People for ‘Open Borders’ are mentally ill.

Principles are important. Pragmatism is important. In principle, I’m a libertarian. In practice, I’m a nationalist. I understand that I’m in a world where a libertarian society is not a first step to a free society, therefore, pragmatism wins. Nationalism wins. Nationalism is capable of politically curbing globalism. Libertarianism is not.

When it comes to borders, there are only two politically viable choices. Forced inclusion or forced exclusion.

Given that Sweden has turned into the rape capital of the world, I want forced exclusion. Given that Germany & France have an Islamic Terrorist attack every other week, I want forced exclusion. Both scenarios are anti-libertarian. The refugee system is, of course, a government program. A program with a globalist agenda at that.

What’s astounding, is that many people look at these real life case studies, yet still operate with assumption that it can work. Albert Einstein defined insanity as “doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.” This is why my only conclusion is that open border advocates are mentally ill.

Open borders are fine, in the ‘make believe’ world where everyone believes in western values, free markets, women’s rights and gay rights. But that’s not the world we live in.