Aug 8, 2017 · 1 min read
So I just finished reading the original manifesto. I went there looking for the position that is anti-diversity and what I found was actually quite different. You claim that he’s said that women are bad engineers but not once did he say that he considered women to be bad engineers. He’s asking for all people (including women) to be hired on merit. The position of the manifesto was at it’s core egalitarian. You’re article is misleading and dangerous and you have well earned your classification as an unreliable analyst.
