Nina followed the real data while our profession followed the money………..So yes I would recommend butter slathered on my steak. I also suggest the patient get outside and off technology as much as possible. Why? The data has lead me to the conclusion. You should read Joel thinks you don’t agree with. You might learn that all we were taught is not so. Cardiology has a deep problem in there literature. It is called PEER review and it is tied to corporate money sponsorship. Just look what food have the AHA approval signal. It is a farce. It is an embarrassment to the real truth. Cardiology is telling us that if all the facts published don’t fit their theories of heat diseases, all you have to do is publicity to change the facts. Cardiology know that perception drives reality, but this is not how science really works. The lay public and journalists have disrupted this method and now the purveyors of half truths and false beliefs want them castigated? We have 70 years of abject failure in cardiology. People are still acquiring this mitochondrial disease at record rates when they are on low fat high statin diets. A smart man once said when you continued to pursue the same course of therapy over and over again, but the results are the same, and you expect a different result this time because your new drug trial says so, that is simply lunacy. So anyone who upsets this pathetic applecart is OK with me, whether they be a jounralist or a fiction writer or a wise researcher. The first ingredient to being wrong is to claim that you are right. You have that down pat Joel. Geniuses have a knack for raising new questions. Nina has tapped that by asking the questions we in medicine should have asked long ago but did not because we chose profit over purpose. This is why genius are viewed so differently by public crowds today. Hence by the public geniuses are either admired for their creativity or, even more commonly so, detested for disturbing the daily peace of mind of the paradigm in power. That is what your piece here is really about Joel. Read a bit more data Joel about what you’ve really missed. All the PEER reviewed literature that goes against conventional wisdom in cardiology. I used to be like you but then I read some controversial data that showed my the truth in cardiology is build on a poor foundation. Some in your profession are watching you and when you embarrass yourself Joel and it’s our job to point it out.