How much money did Sybils get from last Airdrop events

L1ghtik
3 min readJan 23, 2024

--

In the ever-evolving landscape of Web3, airdrops have emerged as a crucial mechanism for rewarding early users and promoting tokens. However, the integrity of these events is being jeopardized by the rise of Sybil attacks, where entities manipulate the distribution system for their benefit. This article delves into specific cases involving Aptos, Arbitrum, Optimism, and Celestia, shedding light on the significant financial implications of Sybil attacks on these projects.

Aptos Airdrop: Unintended Consequences

The Aptos Foundation’s announcement of a generous airdrop of over 20 million APT tokens to early testnet users initially sounded promising. However, the aftermath of this distribution revealed a disturbing trend of Sybil attacks impacting the project.

Sybil Attack’s Impact on APT Prices

Following the airdrop, APT prices experienced a sharp decline as Sybil addresses swiftly dumped large quantities of APT on the Binance platform. Notably, 40% of the 28,000 users depositing 16.3 million APT tokens on Binance were identified as Sybil addresses.

Sybil Domination in Deposits

Despite a subsequent decline in deposits, Sybil addresses continued to dominate the scene. A staggering 65% of total deposits were attributed to Sybil accounts, with seven large addresses alone accounting for 50,000 APT on Binance.

A Broader Perspective: Arbitrum, Optimism, and Celestia

Moving beyond Aptos, Sybil attacks have cast a dark shadow over other prominent projects in the Web3 space. The Arbitrum network identified a staggering 279,328 addresses engaging in Sybil behavior, collectively hoarding $557 million worth of $ARB tokens — equivalent to 47.96% of the total token supply.

Similarly, Celestia’s TIA token airdrop faced manipulation by Sybil groups and airdrop hunters, diverting over 28.92 million TIA tokens from genuine recipients. This malicious activity affected at least 106,491 wallets, revealing the extensive reach of Sybil attacks.

Optimism token airdrop participants were not spared either, as an estimated 17,000 users were rejected after being identified as Sybil accounts. The collective loss for these users amounted to a staggering $18,620,000 in token value, as reported by The Defiant.

My personal calculations of money, received by sybils from airdrops stated above:

  1. Aptos Airdrop:
  • 40% of 16.3 million APT tokens were deposited by Sybil addresses.
  • Assuming these were the only Sybil deposits, it would be 0.4 * 16.3 million = 6.52 million APT tokens.
  • If the APT price crashed to $6.7, the estimated value would be 6.52 million * $6.7 = $43,684,000.

2. Arbitrum Airdrop:

  • 279,328 Sybil addresses identified hoarding $557 million worth of $ARB tokens.
  • This represents 47.96% of the total token supply.
  • The estimated value of the tokens held by Sybils is 0.4796 * $557 million = $267,027,200.

3. Celestia Airdrop:

  • Over 28.92 million TIA tokens were diverted by Sybil groups and airdrop hunters.
  • The estimated value of the diverted tokens is 28.92 million * $2 = $57,840,000.

4. Optimism Airdrop:

  • An estimated 17,000 users rejected as Sybil accounts lost a collective $18,620,000 worth of tokens.

Total Estimated Value of Airdrops Received by Sybils:

  • $43,684,000 (Aptos) + $267,027,200 (Arbitrum) + $57,840,000 (Celestia) + $18,620,000 (Optimism) = $387,171,200.

The Repercussions of Sybil Identification

Being labeled as a Sybil account signifies that an algorithm has detected the operation of multiple wallet addresses with the sole intention of farming airdrops. This practice is widely frowned upon, as it suggests a lack of genuine contribution to the blockchain ecosystem and instead seeks to exploit airdrops for personal gain.

The Path Forward

Despite the challenges posed by Sybil attacks, some projects are actively addressing the issue. Initiatives like 0xScore view Sybil attacks as a significant challenge in today’s crypto landscape and are pioneering solutions to ensure fairer token distribution.

In conclusion, the financial implications of Sybil attacks on Web3 projects are profound, affecting token prices, community trust, and the overall integrity of airdrop events. As we navigate this evolving landscape, it is crucial for the crypto community to unite and develop robust solutions to counter the looming threat of Sybil attacks. Only through collective efforts can we ensure the fair and equitable distribution of tokens in the decentralized future.

--

--