Latin: res judicata

The matter has been settled — don’t bother trying again.

Parents should learn and teach their children a little Latin; “res judicata” would prevent a child from pleading his/her case to the second parent. A parent should be shrewd enough not hear the matter again when the child brings a better argument (or new evidence, even if the new evidence was not previously available) to the second parent.

Not sure this is actually good for in-home litigation; children should be shown a measure of grace because they are not practiced professionals. But there must be a way to terminate petitions. This might me an opportunity to teach children to investigate a matter thoroughly and prepare their case before simply whining to get their way.

Far from being qualified to practice law, but having fun learning a few new terms and concepts. Thanks Thin Man for another study prompt.

BTW: I read through “Oral Argument” and “last term’s decision in the case” links.

These were fascinating for me (a non-lawyer, life-learner). I took note of the order within the SCOTUS, the opinion of the court on this particular case and the concurring and dissenting opinions offered by three individual justices (not sure what is “normal” — just observing). This matter in interesting to me and I should be familiar with the arguments that have been proffered by both sides and their outcomes.

This also raised questions about circuit courts (just scratching the surface). I found the 11 federal circuit court of appeals; it appears that district 4 was divided to form district 11 (just musing).

Thanks again for the learning prompt.