Twitter Bans Independent Journalist After Exposing Extensive Perjury Campaign to Sway Court Cases in Favour of General Motors, Ford, British Petroleum, and Royal Dutch Shell

lstwhl
lstwhl
Sep 7, 2018 · 7 min read

News hauliers have lately been obsessing over any incident involving cycling, however, the homicide of Carole Boardman who was crushed from behind by a mobile phone using motorist, Liam Rosney, has been left relatively ignored. Rosney certainly hasn’t hit the dizzying media heights of celebrity cycling villian Charlie Alliston, or the Winsdor triathlete who bumped into a horse that was contrived into international news. For the uninitiated this may be even more suprising if one learns that Carole Boardman was also the mother of former Olympic cyclist, sports presenter, and now Manchester’s transport cycling marketing personality, Chris Boardman.

Judge and Jury

The trial was not just another case of motor violence either because Mr Rosney and his wife, Victoria Rosney, were also charged with perverting the course of justice after wiping data from their phones and hiding evidence. Not only that, Rosney’s father who is a senior police officer attempted to obstruct investigating officers from retrieving the phone from his daughter-in-law’s place of work by saying that was against protocol. When police did arrive she hid her phone with a colleague, and once the phone was eventially retrieved police did indeed discover that all call data had been wiped from the day of the crash. Despite this, yesterday for some unreported reason, the presiding judge Rhys Rowlands advised the jury to return not guilty verdicts which they did. The defence proposed that data can just “fall off” an iPhone or some other device, and Rosney gave the following explanation:

[Just my recent call data] may have [been deleted] without me realising because it was wet conditions and I’m trying frantically to make calls.

One may be already asking after the point of a jury if judges can veto decisions, and there will be another chance for a gross miscarriage of justice because Rosney is at least still accused of death by dangerous driving and an alternative charge of causing death by careless driving.

I can see it now, offering the jury to make a decision on the lesser charge of carelessness will enable a non-custodial sentence and Liam Rosney whose choice of vehicle is a Mitsubishi Warrior, will no doubt plead extreme hardship with his income dependent on the ability to drive so will escape any driving ban.

A Grand Indirect Perjury Campaign

As this trial was collapsing on the instruction of what looks like a bent cop and bent judge, just what were news hauliers doing? Interestingly enough they were too busy libeling some one who had been knocked off their bike.

Cyclist hits car with his bike in shocking road rage attack near Westminster Abbey that left vehicle so damaged the brand badge fell off. Shocking video shows brazen cyclist dismount and attack motorist

Once you look into the story and beyond the headline, the Daily Mail actually present retaliation as initial aggression. First of all there’s obviously a prior event the Mail do not show which is likely some sort of violent driving. Secondly the driver is chastised by a third party who was cycling and yet another third party pedestrian; and most damningly of all, when one clicks through to the main article and actively view the fuller video, the motorist pushes the rider to the floor. Only then does he retaliate by bashing the car. When the Mail presented this on the frontpage the video they used had been cut to exclude the assault framing just the victim’s response.

This story literally was one that pushed news of Carole Boardman’s trial into a desensationalised small insert brief opposed to the full page spread. Similarly, the next day we have another minor event contrived to national news.

Lycra-clad lout ploughs into little girl on his bike and leaves her shocked and in tears as he rides away

Lycra-clad lout plought into little girl on his bike and leaves her shocked and i tears as he riders away.

The motivation behind this over-exposure of what really are minor events lies in the desire to alter court and political proceedings in favour of the motoring industry. Portraying cycling in a negative light is as an indirect way of perjudicing juries currently sat and those that will exist in the future, so they will have conscious or subconscious animosity for victims of motoring violence.

As I’m inclined to do, I was keeping record of these fake news events and had the following to say:

Another superb example of how the Daily Mail partakes in a broadscale pejury campaign to protect motorists and wage a #mediawaroncycling.

So much to unpack here. Firstly a video is presented on the frontpage which clearly indicates a prior conflict. this is a common tactic where the aggressor is the motorist but the victim’s reaction is the only event portrayed.

Clicking through to the full video and you see that the driver deliberately knocks the person cycling off his bike and only then does the victim retaliate by throwing his bicycle at the car.

Did the daily mail make a mistake? “The audacious jaywalker, perhaps inspired by the cyclists angry outbursts, raises her finger to the driver.” Was it an american that wrote this piece to have it laundered through @bridiepjones?

May I suggest @bridiepjones that the “jaywalker” [of which there is no such thing in the UK] waved a finger of condemnation because she saw the violent behaviour of the motorist.

Remember though @peterwalker99 @carltonreid @lauralaker @vonnymoos the invisible spook and that jononobody from that crappy cycling mag will still insist this system of perjury does not exist.

So many threads to investigate, exactly zero pulled by fake news writer and launderer, Bridie P Jones, and interestingly the aggressive motorist, Charlotte Pierzchniak, seems to work on UI design for autonomous vehicles.

Some time later my account gets suspended and I receive the following message.

Your account, @lstwhl, has been suspended for violating the Twitter Rules.

Specifically, for:

Violating our rules against hateful conduct. You may not promote violence against, threaten or harass other people on the basis of race ethnicity national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, religious affiliation, age, disability, or serious disease.

“@bridiepjones Remember though @peterwalker99 @carltonreid @lauralaker @vonnymoos the invisible spook and that jono nobody from that crappy cycling mag will still insist this system of perjury does not exist.”

Maybe this is some mistake because the tweet given as evidence of my “hateful conduct” contains none of the sort (unless factual statements are now acts of violence), and neither does it mention any demographic let alone target any demographics listed (unless being Press Association quislings is now protected identity).

As such I contacted Twitter to appeal this injustice.

Hello,

Your account has been suspended and will not be restored because it was found to be violating Twitter’s Terms of Service, specifically the Twitter Rules against hateful conduct.

It is against our rules to promote violence against or directly attack or threaten other people on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, religious affiliation, age, disability, or disease.

Additionally, if we determine that the primary purpose of an account is to incite harm towards others on the basis of these categories, that account may be suspended without prior warning.

You can learn more about our policy against hateful conduct here: https://help.twitter.com/rules-and-policies/hateful-conduct-policy.

Thanks,

Twitter

Yes, thanks Twitter.

Update

Still banned, Twitter still Kafkaesque and an unsafe platform for all who aren’t protected demographics like the US military’s ISIS network, nazi bots, and so on.

lstwhl

Written by

lstwhl

Forensic Journalist

Welcome to a place where words matter. On Medium, smart voices and original ideas take center stage - with no ads in sight. Watch
Follow all the topics you care about, and we’ll deliver the best stories for you to your homepage and inbox. Explore
Get unlimited access to the best stories on Medium — and support writers while you’re at it. Just $5/month. Upgrade