Why reply to assume my point is not correct and then give examples that show my point is correct?
John Bestevaar

How do you figure I’m demonstrating your point is correct? I would point out that you haven’t actually proven your original point, either — that “the system destroys” good people working in banking — while I offered examples of how those good people clearly /aren’t/ crushed by this system.

On that note, we’re clearly not going to come to any kind of agreement or consensus here, so have a lovely rest of your weekend.