Why reply to assume my point is not correct and then give examples that show my point is correct?
John Bestevaar
1

How do you figure I’m demonstrating your point is correct? I would point out that you haven’t actually proven your original point, either — that “the system destroys” good people working in banking — while I offered examples of how those good people clearly /aren’t/ crushed by this system.

On that note, we’re clearly not going to come to any kind of agreement or consensus here, so have a lovely rest of your weekend.