Dear Readers of this article,
Jossif Ezekilov
66050

If this writer (and I use the term generously) were on task in critiquing Ms. Johnstone’s premise, the above would not be rife with blatant deception. “fellow PROGRESSIVES”; “truth to power”; “troll”; “fake news”; her previous profession was writing astrology books??????????????????????????
The no fly zone ramifications are worth discussion. This smear job is not only asinine and poorly written; it is, in it’s purpose, immoral. -I canvassed door to door for FIVE months. The most often sited reason for rejecting Clinton was in fact her no fly zone Hawk stance. The only other reason that came close was DISHONESTY of her and her minions.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.