I’m working hard to try and wrap my head around using these technologies to make prototypes for experience. I see that there is a lot of potential with for example web sockets to make fast interactive prototypes but I have a hard time beeing creative right now and coming up with new ideas. I feel like I’m in a phase where I’m expanding my toolbox for what is possible with todays technologies, there is a lot I never heard about or knew was possible. But in this phase of widening my horizon, and realizing how much possibilities we have as interaction designers today, I can’t grasp the limitations. I think sometimes it’s hard to relate to the possibilites when I don’t understand where the possibilities stop. Thinking outside the box requiers me to know what the box looks like. I’m rambeling :)

I like the thought of “Experinence Prototyping” that Buchenau and Suri talks about, that it is an attitude towards designening more than a set of techniques. There is so many factors to take into consideration as an interaction designer when you want to prototype an experinece. Something that I think is still missing is theorys about verbal communication. In many ways we build the communication around the prototype and the experience of the prototype but we still live in a world that relies very much on communicating with words. I remember an old saying that goes something like: I know you think you understand what I said but I’m not sure that you get that what you heard was not what I meant. What I mean by that is that it’s very hard to make sure that you truly understand what someone is actually saying. Something to be aware of when designing the experience.

Like what you read? Give Lisa Bolmsten a round of applause.

From a quick cheer to a standing ovation, clap to show how much you enjoyed this story.