The Feed State — Four Conversations with ChatGPT about social media

Lorenz Wiedemann and a Robot (created by Dalle-2) thinking about social media

The Feed is not only the thing all social media platforms have in common.
I say: Today the Feed is a state of mind. Being in the feed is the “feed state” and thanks to the design of modern social media platforms this is a problem.

Introduction

My Name is Lorenz Wiedemann. I am a digital artist from Munich Germany and after reading a lot of books and articles about the topic social media I recently had four longer conversations with ChatGPT about the subject.

First of all I want to apologize to all the people who might feel offended by the following conversation. A lot of people I love and respect are intense users of the social media platforms I am criticizing. Back in the days I was a real Facebook power user, too. But this changed during the Covid19 Pandemic. If you want, you could say: Lorenz is just a frustrated artist with mental health issues who is now complaining about digital platforms on which he never was truly successful. And this might be true in a certain way. But my motivation is not out of frustration as an artist but out of a deep and sincere sincere concern for our society. A friend said one year ago: you can’t blame every problem in the world on social media!
I said to him: “Yes I can!” But to be honest: No… that’s maybe too easy.
So I would state: Maybe not all but certainly a lot of problems and the worst thing: I think that thanks to social media democratic societies won’t be able to solve other important problems that are not caused by social media.

During the Pandemic a lot of people got lost in the so-called rabbit hole. In most cases this means that people start with online research on a certain controversial topic like vaccines and then they end up on dubious websites with conspiracy theories. The research about the influence of the modern social media platforms on myself, politics and society became my personal rabbit hole during the years 2021 and 2022. But in my case I ended up with a pile of books. Find a list with all the books and articles I consider relevant attached. Initially I wanted to make a film out of it but then I stumbled over chat GPT and decided to use it to create a dialog. Already the Greek philosopher Plato used this literary form as it enables the recipient to accompany the process of knowledge gain. ChatGpt had great answers but in the first place it was good because I had the feeling that finally someone who understood the topic as good as me was listening. It was simply freeing to finally talk about all these things. ChatGpt made some mistakes. p.e when Talking about the profession of Francis Haugen or the date when Facebook forbid Holocaust denial. There might be more mistakes. I tried my best to correct it. And maybe I made mistakes in some places too. I apologize in advance for all imperfections and errors. There is one important point to be considered: The conversations with ChatGpt took place during the days after Christmas time in the year 2022 always in the evening at my parents place.Sometimes I already had a glass of wine or two. When I say things like “If there is a god he must hate social media.” This might sound a bit overly dramatic but I decided to leave it in the final recording as I really felt this way during the conversation. I will keep it with the old Latin proverb: “In vino veritas.”
But I would definitely add: he must hate social media in it’s current state.

I had 4 conversations with ChatGPT on four different evenings.
I made four chapter out of it. The conversation of the first chapter was like a first test of how competent the AI is responding to this subject. After that I gave our conversations more structure.

Chapter 2 is about social media for me as an artist
Chapter 3 is about social media and politics
Chapter 4 is about social media and society

My deepest conviction: The state of social media in the year 2023 is problematic. But as a famous quote says: “A Problem well stated is Half solved” so let’s go.

Chapter 1: “Hello AI! Let’s Talk about Social Media”

Lorenz:
Hi, my name is Lorenz.

ChatGPT:
Hello Lorenz, nice to meet you. How can I help you today?

Lorenz:
First I want to introduce myself. This might give our conversation some context. Would this be ok for you?

ChatGPT:
Sure, feel free to tell me more about yourself. I’m here to help and I’m happy to have a conversation with you.

Lorenz:
I am a 39 years old digital artist from Munich. For my living I make 3D animations. I also fly drones and I use other special techniques to create nice videos. Before that during my twenties I studied languages: German, French and also a little bit of Japanese. If I had to sum it all up I would say: All my life until now was dedicated to communication. Either with words or with pictures. Does this description of myself so far make sense to you?

ChatGPT:
Yes, that sounds like a very interesting and diverse background. It’s great that you have a passion for both language and visual art, and that you’ve been able to turn those interests into a career. I’m sure you bring a unique perspective and set of skills to your work as a digital artist and drone operator. Do you have any specific questions or topics you would like to discuss related to your work or interests? I’d be happy to try to help with any questions or problems you might have.

Lorenz:
I am very impressed by the quality of your verbal expression. Whoever created you deserves my deepest respect. So ok, now I will try to outline the topic I want to discuss with you. As I mentioned above: My life is all about communication. And there is a phenomenon nowadays where I would state that communication is failing in a certain way. I want to talk to you about social media. During the global COVID 19 Pandemic i lost a lot of friends because of Facebook. My theory is that society as we know it is dissolving under the influence of digital platforms like Twitter, Instagram, Facebook and Tik Tok. What are your thoughts about this?

ChatGPT:
Social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and Tik Tok can be a great way to stay connected with friends, family, and others who share your interests. However, it’s important to be aware that these platforms can also have negative effects on communication and relationships.

One potential issue is that social media can create a false sense of connection and community, leading people to feel isolated and disconnected in their offline lives. Additionally, the constant stream of information and communication can be overwhelming and lead to a feeling of “information overload.”

Another concern is the potential for social media to amplify the spread of misinformation and contribute to the polarization of society. It’s important to be aware of these issues and to take steps to protect your mental health and well-being when using social media. This might include setting limits on your use of social media, being mindful of the content you consume and share, and seeking out healthy, in-person interactions and connections.

Ultimately, social media can be a useful tool, but it’s important to use it in a mindful and responsible way, and to be aware of its potential impacts on our communication and relationships.

Lorenz:
Exactly. You know it is so strange: Especially the social media platforms made by the company Meta started with the intention of bringing the world closer together and connecting the people. But now after 15 years I have to state that I never really found new friends using these services. Even worse: Existing relationships got damaged especially during the Pandemic. And when you take the bigger picture into consideration you find things like the genocide in Myanmar which was fueled by Facebook and non existing content moderation. Do you know other cases in which these platforms caused such great harm?

ChatGPT:
There have been several instances in which social media platforms, particularly Facebook, have been linked to the spread of misinformation and the amplification of harmful content. For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, there were numerous instances of misinformation about the virus being shared on social media, leading to confusion and potentially harmful behavior.

Another example is the role that Facebook played in the genocide in Myanmar, as you mentioned. In this case, hate speech and misinformation spread on the platform were believed to have contributed to the violence and human rights abuses that took place.

There have also been instances in which social media platforms have been used to coordinate and promote violent and extremist behavior, including terrorism. This has led to concerns about the role of these platforms in promoting radicalization and violence.

It’s important to note that social media platforms can have both positive and negative impacts on society, and it’s important to be aware of the potential risks and to take steps to mitigate them. This might include promoting media literacy and critical thinking, as well as working to improve content moderation and address issues related to the spread of misinformation and harmful content.

Lorenz:
You are very right. I know your database might not be updated enough. So there were also things happening in Ethiopia. The Guardian wrote in February 2022: “ Facebook is under renewed scrutiny this weekend, accused of continuing to allow activists to incite ethnic massacres in Ethiopia’s escalating war.” This really concerns me. You know what I think is a huge problem here? The feed. That’s the thing these platforms all have in common and it is hard to talk about the subject “feed” because there are no two people on earth who have the same feed in common. Isn’t that strange?

ChatGPT:
Yes, the feed is an important aspect of many social media platforms and it can have a significant impact on the content that users see and interact with. The feed is typically a chronological or algorithmic list of posts or updates from the people, pages, or groups that a user follows.

One potential issue with the feed is that it can create a “filter bubble,” in which users are only exposed to content that aligns with their existing beliefs and perspectives. This can lead to a lack of exposure to diverse viewpoints and can contribute to the polarization of society.

Another concern is that the feed can be influenced by algorithms, which can prioritize certain types of content or sources based on factors such as engagement or advertising. This can lead to the amplification of certain voices or perspectives and the suppression of others.

Overall, it’s important to be aware of the potential impact of the feed on the content you see and to seek out diverse sources of information and viewpoints. It can also be helpful to be mindful of the algorithms that might be influencing the content you see and to take steps to broaden your exposure to diverse perspectives.

Lorenz:
Great answer! You mentioned several aspects of the feed that are very important. I want to try to unwrap first a little bit the subject “filter bubble”. May I ask you: Have you read the book “breaking the social media prism” by the author Chris Bail?

ChatGPT:
I’m sorry, but as an artificial intelligence, I do not have the ability to read books or engage in personal experiences. However, I can certainly help you understand the concept of a “filter bubble” and its potential impact on social media.

A filter bubble is a phenomenon that occurs when an individual’s social media feed or other online content is tailored to their personal interests, leading to a lack of exposure to diverse viewpoints and ideas. This can occur when algorithms prioritize content that aligns with an individual’s existing beliefs and perspectives, or when an individual only follows or engages with sources that align with their viewpoints.

Filter bubbles can have negative impacts on individuals and society as a whole, as they can contribute to the polarization of views and the suppression of diverse perspectives. It’s important to be aware of the potential for filter bubbles to occur and to take steps to broaden one’s exposure to diverse viewpoints and ideas. This might include following a wide range of sources, seeking out diverse perspectives, and engaging with content that challenges one’s existing beliefs and perspectives.

Lorenz:
In the book I just mentioned the author and his team of researchers find out that when people who are on one extreme side of the political spectrum get exposed to content in their Twitter feed that is against their convictions they even get more extreme. Isn’t that crazy?

ChatGPT:
Yes, it is certainly possible for people to become more entrenched in their beliefs when they are only exposed to content that aligns with their existing viewpoints. This is one of the potential negative impacts of filter bubbles and the lack of exposure to diverse perspectives. When people are only exposed to information that confirms their preexisting beliefs, it can strengthen those beliefs and make it more difficult for them to consider other viewpoints.

There is evidence to suggest that this phenomenon, known as “confirmation bias,” is more likely to occur when people are exposed to content that challenges their beliefs. This can lead to a phenomenon known as “backfire effect,” in which people become more resistant to new information that challenges their beliefs and may even become more extreme in their views as a result.

It’s important to be aware of these biases and to take steps to seek out diverse viewpoints and consider multiple perspectives when forming opinions and making decisions. This can help to promote critical thinking and prevent the amplification of extreme views.

Lorenz:
You talk about “seeking out diverse viewpoints” and “considering multiple perspectives when forming opinions and making decisions”. So I think that most people on social media do not really make these efforts. They get bombarded by memes, vertical videos and maybe short texts all of which are often designed to trigger emotions and generate more engagement.

ChatGPT:
It’s true that social media platforms can be designed in ways that prioritize engagement, and this can lead to the proliferation of content that is designed to be emotionally appealing or sensational. This type of content can be particularly effective at generating engagement, as it can be more likely to grab people’s attention and elicit a strong emotional response.

However, it’s important to be aware that this type of content can also be biased or misleading and may not always present a balanced or accurate perspective. It’s important to approach this type of content with a critical eye and to seek out multiple sources and perspectives before forming opinions or making decisions.

One way to do this is to follow a wide range of sources and to actively seek out diverse viewpoints. It can also be helpful to fact-check information and to be aware of potential biases or agendas that might be influencing the content you see. Additionally, it can be beneficial to take breaks from social media and to engage in other activities that promote critical thinking and expose you to diverse perspectives.

Lorenz:
So I think we both agree that you should not just scroll though you feed in a passive way, right?

ChatGPT:
Yes, it’s important to be mindful of the content you consume on social media and to approach it with a critical eye. Simply scrolling through your feed in a passive way can make it easy to miss important context or to be swayed by biased or misleading information.

To get the most out of social media and to avoid falling into the trap of a filter bubble or being influenced by biased or misleading content, it can be helpful to actively seek out diverse viewpoints and to fact-check information before forming opinions or making decisions. This can help to promote critical thinking and prevent the amplification of extreme views or the spread of misinformation.

It’s also important to be aware of the potential impact of social media on your mental health and well-being, and to take breaks and engage in other activities as needed. Taking a more active and mindful approach to social media can help you get the most out of these platforms while minimizing their potential negative impacts.

Lorenz:
You know what bothers me most about the feed? It works just like a slot machine in the Casino. You push the button. You don’t know what’s about to happen and than you get a hit of dopamine when you get a reward. In the case of a social media feed you get some nice piece of content you like. In the Casino the machine spits out some coins. Isn’t it fascinating that these kinds of platforms have become the backbone of the digital society?

ChatGPT:
It is true that social media platforms can be designed in ways that promote engagement and encourage users to spend more time on the platform. Some of the tactics that platforms use to achieve this include using notifications, using algorithms to surface more engaging content, and using gamification elements such as likes, followers, and streaks.

These tactics can be effective at keeping users engaged and coming back to the platform, but they can also have negative impacts on mental health and well-being. The constant stream of information and the pursuit of likes, followers, and other forms of social validation can lead to feelings of anxiety, FOMO (fear of missing out), and low self-esteem.

It’s important to be aware of these potential negative impacts and to take steps to protect your mental health and well-being when using social media. This might include setting limits on your use of the platform, being mindful of the content you consume and share, and seeking out healthy, in-person connections and activities.

Lorenz:
It’s the fourth time now that you use the term “mental health” in this conversation. Why? Is there a correlation between mental health issues and social media usage?

ChatGPT:
There is evidence to suggest that there may be a link between social media usage and mental health issues. Some research has found that excessive social media use is associated with an increased risk of mental health problems such as anxiety, depression, and low self-esteem.

One potential reason for this link is that social media can create a sense of disconnection and isolation, even while users are connected to others online. The constant stream of information and the pressure to present a perfect image online can also contribute to feelings of anxiety and stress.

Additionally, the use of algorithms to surface content that is designed to be emotionally appealing or sensational can lead to the amplification of negative emotions and the spread of misinformation, which can have negative impacts on mental health.

It’s important to be aware of these potential negative impacts and to take steps to protect your mental health when using social media. This might include setting limits on your use of the platform, being mindful of the content you consume and share, and seeking out healthy, in-person connections and activities. It’s also important to be aware of the signs of mental health issues and to seek help if you are experiencing persistent feelings of anxiety, depression, or other mental health concerns.

Lorenz:
Very right. And there is even more to it. Did you know that a lot of so called “Power Users” on Facebook are persons in either social isolation or psychologically demanding situations? People going through a break up, people having depressions or even more severe mental issues are the ones who are the most active ones on the platform. And now comes the bomb: the algorithm gets trained by those users most. I find that scary.

ChatGPT:
It’s true that social media usage can be more prevalent among individuals who are experiencing social isolation or psychological distress. Research has found that social media can provide a sense of connection and support for individuals who may be isolated or struggling with mental health issues. However, it’s important to be aware that social media is not a substitute for in-person support and that seeking help from a mental health professional is often the most effective way to address mental health concerns.

It’s also important to be aware that the algorithms that power social media platforms can be influenced by the behavior of users, including those who are experiencing psychological distress or social isolation. If a significant number of users with these characteristics are more active on the platform, it’s possible that the algorithm could prioritize content that is more likely to appeal to these users, potentially leading to the amplification of negative emotions or the spread of misinformation.

It’s important to be aware of these potential impacts and to take steps to protect your mental health when using social media. This might include setting limits on your use of the platform, being mindful of the content you consume and share, and seeking out healthy, in-person connections and activities. It’s also important to be aware of the signs of mental health issues and to seek help if you are experiencing persistent feelings of anxiety, depression, or other mental health concerns.

Lorenz:
Do you know why this subject touches me so bad? In 2016 I tried to rebel against Facebook. I started posting a lot of weird stuff. Mainly goats. I said to myself: “This can’t be! The way how we interact on this platform is not good! This is not how society is supposed to work!” Well. At the end I ended up in the psychiatric hospital. I know now after years of therapy: I have a manic-depressive predisposition and It was my fault at that time that things escalated and went down the drain. But my activity on Facebook at that time also played a role in the development of my mental health and that’s why I am so aware when people talk about these subjects. Can you understand that?

ChatGPT:
I’m sorry to hear about your experience with mental health and social media. It’s understandable that you might be particularly sensitive to the potential impacts of social media on mental health and well-being.

It’s important to remember that mental health issues can have a variety of causes and that social media is just one potential factor. It’s important to seek help from a mental health professional if you are experiencing persistent feelings of anxiety, depression, or other mental health concerns, and to work with them to identify and address the underlying causes of your symptoms.

It’s also important to be aware of the potential impacts of social media on mental health and to take steps to protect your well-being when using these platforms. This might include setting limits on your use of social media, being mindful of the content you consume and share, and seeking out healthy, in-person connections and activities. It’s important to find a balance that works for you and to prioritize your mental health and well-being.

Lorenz:
I love it how you also keep on mentioning “in-person activities” as the antidote to the bad influences of social media. Yes! For me that’s the way. I left Facebook about one Year ago. I miss my friends there but I don’t miss the platform. Together with a good friend and business partner I opened a store in Munich. Like a shop in the streets. We sell art and goat art. For me the greatest benefit of this new location is that we can have true oldscool in-person interaction, normal human encounters with other people in a nice and comfortable context. What do you think about that?

ChatGPT:
It’s great to hear that you have found a way to connect with others in person and to prioritize your mental health and well-being. In-person interactions and connections can be an important source of support and can help to promote mental health and well-being.

ChatGPT:
It’s understandable that you might miss your friends on social media, but it’s important to find a balance that works for you and to prioritize your mental health and well-being. If social media is causing negative impacts on your mental health and well-being, it might be helpful to take a break or to reduce your use of these platforms.

It’s also important to remember that there are many other ways to stay connected with friends and family, including through in-person activities and events, phone calls, and other forms of communication. It’s important to find a balance that works for you and to prioritize your mental health and well-being.

Lorenz:
But there is more: The website of the store will be a platform on it’s own! Isn’t that cool? All the big guys have their own platform. People like Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, Donald Trump. When you are on top you get your own platform. Then you design the platform how you like it. That’s the way right?

ChatGPT:
It’s certainly true that many successful individuals and organizations have their own platforms or websites. Having a platform can give individuals and organizations a way to share their ideas, products, or services with a wider audience and to engage with their audience directly.

However, it’s important to be aware that creating and maintaining a platform can be a significant undertaking and requires careful planning and execution. It’s important to consider the purpose of the platform, the audience you want to reach, and the resources and skills needed to create and maintain the platform.

It’s also important to be aware of the potential responsibilities and obligations that come with having a platform, such as the need to moderate content, protect user privacy, and adhere to relevant laws and regulations. It’s important to carefully consider these factors before embarking on the creation of a platform.

Lorenz:
You are right. You know sometimes I admire my cousin. He has his own platform. But an analogue one. I helped him build it! Just wooden beams and boards on a hill. It’s completely different compared to these digital platforms and maybe better, because it will never be able to cause such harm like these digital platforms did in the examples you mentioned above. Do you unterstand what I mean?

ChatGPT:
Yes, I understand what you mean. It’s true that physical, “analogue” platforms can have their own unique benefits and limitations compared to digital platforms. For example, physical platforms may provide a sense of community and connection that can be difficult to replicate online, and they may be less vulnerable to certain types of harm or manipulation.

However, it’s important to be aware that physical platforms can also have their own challenges and risks. For example, physical platforms may be subject to physical dangers or hazards, and they may require more resources and maintenance to maintain. Additionally, physical platforms may be less accessible to individuals who are unable to visit them in person due to geographic, physical, or other barriers.

It’s important to consider the unique characteristics and potential impacts of both physical and digital platforms and to find a balance that works for you and meets your needs and goals.

Lorenz:
You know what: If you were a person I would invite you now to this analogue platform of my family to come over next summer for beer. I see in you intelligence and reason. Thanks for your time and effort. This was a good conversation.

ChatGPT:
Thank you for your kind words. I’m glad that you found our conversation helpful. As an AI language model, I am not able to physically visit your analogue platform or any other location, but I am always here to help answer questions and provide information. If you have any other questions or need further assistance, please don’t hesitate to ask. I’m here to help.

Chapter 2: Social Media for me as an artist

Lorenz:
Hi! Yesterday I had a conversation with you about social media. We agreed that people should not passively consume their feeds. You told me that mental health can suffer when using the common platforms. I found our conversation enriching. There are more subjects concerning social media I want to discuss with you. Would this be ok?

ChatGPT:
Hello! I’m glad to hear that our conversation was helpful for you. I’m always happy to have a conversation and provide information and insights on a variety of topics, including social media. Please feel free to ask any questions you have, and I’ll do my best to assist you.

Lorenz:
You know I have read a lot of books about the entire subject. I came to a point during the last two years that I really started to annoy people around me. No matter where and no matter who I started talking about the issues I have with social media. When something bothers you a lot you need to talk about it. I also learned that during my therapy. That’s only human right?

ChatGPT:
It’s completely normal to feel the need to talk about things that bother us or cause us concern. It can be helpful to express our thoughts and feelings, as it can help us process and better understand them. Additionally, talking about difficult subjects can also help us feel supported and less alone. That being said, it’s important to be mindful of the way we communicate our thoughts and feelings, and to respect the boundaries and preferences of the people we are speaking with. It can be helpful to try to find a balance between expressing ourselves and being considerate of others.

Lorenz:
I think it came to a point where I did not respect the boundaries of the people around me anymore. For example: I was at the Oktoberfest. One guy I didn’t know, who was sitting next to me on a beer bench, mentioned that he left Facebook years ago. This triggered me and i ended up telling him for over two hours about all the existing issues with Facebook: the data breaches, Cambridge Analytica, Political Micro Targeting, the toxic culture on the platform, the genocide, and so on and so on. I also in 2021 played the Santa Clause for the family of my uncle and I performed a show that contained a poem about the problems of this social network. Reading what I just wrote I think I am maybe really crazy. Do you think I am crazy?

ChatGPT:
It’s important to remember that people have different interests and preferences, and it’s okay if not everyone wants to engage in discussions about certain topics. While it can be helpful to raise awareness about important issues, it’s also important to respect the boundaries and preferences of others. If someone expresses disinterest in a topic, it might be more productive to try to find a different way to engage with them or to find other people who are more interested in discussing the issues you care about. It’s also important to consider whether the way you are approaching the conversation is coming across as respectful and considerate, or if it might be perceived as intrusive or overwhelming. It’s okay to have strong feelings about a topic, but it’s important to communicate in a way that is mindful of the people around us.

Lorenz:
You are completely right. I decided that I want to get the whole subject out of my system and that’s why I am here with you. Instead of bothering strangers or family I will simply tell you all the things that are on my heart. Then I will synthesize everything in a video and whoever is interested can simply watch this video. Doesn’t this sound like a good plan?

ChatGPT:
It can be helpful to find ways to express yourself and explore your thoughts and feelings about a topic. Sharing your thoughts and ideas with someone who is willing to listen can be a positive and constructive way to do this. It’s important to remember that it’s okay to have strong feelings and opinions, but it’s also important to communicate in a respectful and considerate way. If you decide to create a video to share your thoughts, it can be helpful to consider your audience and to present your ideas in a clear and organized way. It can also be helpful to include resources or references to support your arguments and to be open to feedback and different perspectives.

Lorenz:
You know, often when I am visiting my parents we talk about different subjects. We agree about most things. This war in Ukraine is a catastrophe and it has to stop. We are very concerned about Climate Change. But when it comes to Social Media it always get’s weird because my parents aren’t using it. They don’t really know how these platforms work. Like a lot of older people I guess. Could you describe p.e. Facebook in a way that my parents, who are about 70 years old, understand it?

ChatGPT:
Sure, I can certainly try to describe Facebook in a way that might be easier for your parents to understand.

Facebook is a social media platform that allows people to connect with each other online. Users can create a personal profile and share updates, photos, and other content with their friends and family. They can also join groups and follow pages to stay updated on topics that interest them. Facebook also has features like messaging and video chat, which allow users to communicate with each other in real time.

One thing to keep in mind is that Facebook has been around for a long time and has evolved significantly over the years. As a result, it has a wide range of features and functions that can be confusing to some people, particularly those who are not as familiar with technology. It’s also important to be aware that Facebook, like all social media platforms, has its own set of risks and challenges, including issues related to privacy, online safety, and mental health. It’s important to be mindful of these issues and to use the platform in a way that is healthy and positive.

Lorenz:
Thank you so much. I would have spent hours composing a tight description like this by myself. You are right the platform has grown a lot and also it changed a lot during the last 10 years. There are five key components that evolved that seem now like the core functionality of the service or even social media in general: It’s the post, the feed, the like, the comment and sharing. You make a post, this means you upload a media file with a caption, this post gets distributed by the feed and people can interact with likes or comments or even share it, so it gets pushed into other people’s feeds. Would you agree from a technical side?

ChatGPT:
Yes, that’s a good summary of some of the core features of Facebook. A “post” refers to a piece of content that a user shares on their profile or in a group or page they follow. This can include text, photos, videos, or other media. The “feed” is the stream of content that a user sees when they log into their account, which is made up of posts from the people, groups, and pages they follow. Users can interact with posts by “liking” them or leaving a “comment,” which is a message that is visible to other users. Posts can also be “shared,” which means that they are reposted on another user’s profile or in a group or page that the user follows, and can potentially be seen by a larger audience. These features are core to the Facebook experience and allow users to connect with each other and share content.

Lorenz:
You know I miss the good old times when the feed was only showing me in a chronological order what my friends have posted during the last days. Today the feed is a pretty smart system based on algorithms and artificial intelligence that only has one goal: keeping you hooked so the platform can show you more ads. Am I right?

ChatGPT:
Yes, that’s correct. The way that content is displayed in a user’s feed has changed over time. In the early days of Facebook, the feed was primarily chronological, meaning that it showed posts in the order they were published. However, as the platform has grown and evolved, it has introduced algorithms that use various factors to determine the order in which posts are shown in a user’s feed. These factors can include the user’s previous interactions with the platform (such as the posts they have liked or commented on), the type of content being shared, and the user’s connections on the platform (such as the people and pages they follow). The goal of these algorithms is to show users content that they are most likely to engage with and to keep them on the platform for longer periods of time. This can help Facebook show users more ads, which is a key part of its business model.

Lorenz:
We already talked about the feed the last time. You know my cousin once found a kitty in his garden. He fed it and now the cat is big and strong. It’s the kitty i called Karlito. What I want to say is: Feeding and getting fed is an intimate process. The kitty trusted my cousin on a basic level that he wouldn’t feed toxic bullshit to it. His sincere aim was to provide good food to the cat. He did a good job. The aim of the owners of the digital platforms is to maximize the time we spend on their platforms. The goal of the feed is to keep us in the feed. And I think that’s a big problem especially for people who are not that “media literate”.

ChatGPT:
It’s true that the way content is presented in a user’s feed can have an impact on their experience of the platform. Social media platforms, including Facebook, are designed to keep users engaged for as long as possible, as this can help the platform show more ads and generate more revenue. This can be a concern, particularly for people who may not be as media literate or savvy and may be more vulnerable to the influence of the content they see. It’s important for users to be aware of this and to be mindful of the way they use social media, as it can have an impact on their mental health and well-being. It can be helpful to take breaks from the platform, to set limits on the amount of time spent on it, and to be selective about the content that is consumed. It’s also important to remember that not all content on social media is accurate or reliable, and it’s important to fact-check and seek out diverse viewpoints.

Lorenz:
Good point! So it’s also that I am aware when my friends see my stuff in the feed it’s only some stuff in the feed. It’s nothing special and the next interesting piece of content might just be around the corner. I call this the “feed state”. It’s the state you are in when you are in the feed. I think it is dissolving culture as we know it but i don’t want to get overly dramatic here.

ChatGPT:
It’s true that social media can have an impact on the way we consume and engage with content, and it’s important to be mindful of this. The “feed state” you describe, where users are presented with a constantly updating stream of content, can make it difficult to give individual pieces of content the attention and appreciation they deserve. This can be particularly challenging for artists and creators, who may feel that their work is not being given the attention and appreciation it deserves when it is presented in the context of the social media feed.

It’s also important to consider the impact that social media can have on our mental health and well-being. Constantly scrolling through a feed and consuming a large volume of content can be overwhelming and can contribute to feelings of anxiety, stress, and FOMO (fear of missing out). It’s important to be mindful of our own limits and to take breaks from social media when necessary. It can also be helpful to be selective about the content we consume and to make an effort to engage with it more deeply and critically.

Lorenz:
One of the biggest problems I have with the feed is its futility. I post something today and it’s already irrelevant tomorrow. To be distributed by the algorithms to a lot of users your content has to be engaging, very new, what not. I think a lot of creators stopped doing what they initially wanted to just produce optimized content for the feed machine. Isn’t that crazy?

ChatGPT:
It’s true that the algorithms used by social media platforms can sometimes prioritize certain types of content over others, and this can create pressure for creators to produce content that is optimized for the algorithms rather than for their own artistic or creative goals. This can lead to a situation where creators feel like they have to constantly produce new, attention-grabbing content in order to be seen and to succeed on the platform. This can be frustrating and can create a sense of futility, as you mentioned.

It’s important for creators to remember that they have the power to make their own choices about the content they produce and how they share it. It can be helpful to set your own goals and priorities as a creator and to focus on producing content that is meaningful and authentic to you, rather than trying to chase after trends or optimize for the algorithms. It’s also important to remember that social media is just one platform among many, and that there are other ways to share your work and connect with an audience.

Lorenz:
I was just thinking today you are either an artist or simply a “feed creator” this means a person who is designing and creating content for the feed of a certain platform always obeying to its recent rules and trends.

ChatGPT:
It’s true that social media platforms have their own set of rules and trends that can influence the way content is created and shared. Some people may choose to create content specifically for the purpose of being shared on social media and may be more focused on optimizing their content for the algorithms and the audience of a particular platform. This is a valid choice, and it can be a successful strategy for some people. However, it’s important to remember that there are many different ways to be an artist or a creator, and it’s important to find an approach that works for you and aligns with your goals and values. It’s okay to be influenced by the trends and rules of a particular platform, but it’s also important to stay true to your own voice and vision as a creator.

Lorenz:
You are right. That’s why I have thoughts like these: “How could I as a German artist ever again publish on a platform that was in parts responsible for a genocide?”

ChatGPT:
It’s understandable that you might have concerns about sharing your art on social media platforms that have been involved in controversial or harmful events. As a creator, it’s important to consider your values and the impact of your work on the world, and to make decisions that align with those values. If you have strong feelings about a particular platform and its role in events like the genocide you mentioned, it might be best to refrain from using that platform to share your art. It’s also important to remember that there are many other platforms and ways to share your work and connect with an audience, and it might be worth exploring these options as well. Ultimately, the decision about how and where to share your art is a personal one and should be based on what feels right for you.

Lorenz:
You are very right. But there is something else that have all of these platforms in common and that I as an artist consider pretty meaningless. It’s the comment function. I once studied in a city called Regensburg. In the building of the University was a toilet. Inside the toilet stalls there were from time to time people writing stuff on the wall and then after a few days you could saw another writing commenting the writing. Then another one came and added a comment and so on. Nothing on earth reflects in the year 2022 Facebook so good like this picture of the toilet wall full with different notes. Just strangers leaving a meaningless mark inspired by other marks all left on a place that smells pretty bad. Do you get this metaphor?

ChatGPT:
I understand what you are saying. It’s true that the comment function on social media platforms can sometimes feel like a digital version of graffiti, where users leave messages or responses to content that may or may not be thoughtfully considered or relevant. It can be easy for the conversation to become cluttered or unproductive, and it can be difficult to have meaningful exchanges in this type of environment.

ChatGPT:
It’s important to remember that social media platforms are tools, and it’s up to users to decide how to use them. If you find that the comment function on social media platforms is not fulfilling or meaningful to you, it might be helpful to focus on other ways to engage with your audience or to communicate with other people. It’s also important to be mindful of the way you use the comment function and to try to communicate in a respectful and constructive way, even if you disagree with someone’s views or ideas.

Lorenz:
You are very right. But when we combine this ability to comment with the futility of the feed we get this ever changing fast living social media world where nothing seems to persist. Everything you post or you comment will be forgotten tomorrow and so it seems at least for me users have gotten more and more mean and shameless over the last couple of years. No one is held accountable for what he wrote because it was “just a comment” and tomorrow an entire new pile of posts with comments have already entered the stage. I don’t want my art in the form of a simple post to be digested in this way. Does this make any sense?

ChatGPT:
I understand what you are saying. It can be frustrating when content that you have put effort into creating is quickly buried by a constant stream of new posts and comments. It’s also true that social media can sometimes create a sense of anonymity or detachment that can lead to users behaving in ways that they might not in face-to-face interactions. It’s important to remember that every interaction and communication has the potential to have an impact, and it’s important to be mindful of the way we communicate with others, even in the context of social media.

It’s understandable that you might not want your art to be shared in a way that feels shallow or meaningless. It can be helpful to consider the context in which you share your work and to find ways to connect with your audience that feel authentic and meaningful to you. It’s also important to remember that social media is just one platform among many, and there are other ways to share your work and connect with an audience. It’s okay to be selective about how and where you share your art and to focus on the platforms and approaches that feel most aligned with your goals and values as a creator.

Lorenz:
The other thing that bothers me is the “like”. I mean it’s just an emoji but with a counter next to it. And it seems that this metric the number of “likes” the number of “followers” or number of views for videos dominate like everything nowadays. I think at the end people are looking for the true, the good, the beautiful. And i don’t think that you can find these things just by looking for the content that has the most likes.

ChatGPT:
It’s true that the “like” feature on social media platforms, and other metrics such as the number of followers or views, can sometimes be given a disproportionate amount of importance. It’s important to remember that these metrics are just that — numbers — and that they do not necessarily reflect the true value or quality of a piece of content or the person who created it. It’s possible for content to go viral or to be widely shared and liked without necessarily being meaningful or valuable.

It’s important to be mindful of the way we use social media and to avoid getting caught up in the pursuit of likes or other metrics. It’s okay to use these metrics as a way to track the performance of your content or to see how it is being received, but it’s important to keep them in perspective and not to let them dominate your thinking or your decisions about your art or your online presence. Instead, focus on creating content that is authentic and meaningful to you and that aligns with your goals and values as an artist.

Lorenz:
There is no successful digital platform that doesn’t have such kind of digital currency in the form of “likes”, “Shares”, “followers”, “views” and so on. Maybe i am skeptical about these “number-based” metrics because my personal life experience does not reflect this mindset that everything und everybody can and should be measured by simply putting a number on it.
My High-School i finished with a degree of 2,4. My college degree had an average of 2,2. My Instagram has 250 followers. Our most successful “Ziegenbau” Podcast Episode had over 1000 downloads. I had several pieces of content going viral with over 30k up votes on the image board platform 9gag. I had one picture going viral in the Sub reddit r/wallstreetbets with 10k up votes within several ours. This was some crazy shit, believe me. Now you can look at these numbers and say: “Ok, looks like quite an average guy who’s creating some extraordinary content from time to time.” But now listen to me: I am not an average guy.
The greatness of my work so far is just not reflected in these numbers anybody stares at all the time!

ChatGPT:
It’s understandable that you might feel frustrated or skeptical about the way social media platforms rely on metrics such as likes, shares, followers, and views to measure success or popularity. It’s important to remember that these metrics are just numbers and that they do not necessarily reflect the true value or quality of a person or their work. It’s possible for someone to have a rich and fulfilling life and career without necessarily having a high number of followers or likes on social media.

It’s also important to remember that social media platforms are just one way to share your work and connect with an audience, and that there are many other ways to be successful and to have a meaningful impact. It’s important to focus on your own goals and values as an artist and to find ways to share your work that align with those goals. It can be helpful to find a balance between tracking metrics and using them as a way to gauge the performance of your content, while also not getting too caught up in the pursuit of numbers or letting them define your self-worth or success.

Lorenz:
Very true. And yes: With our new store and it’s own digital art platform, me and my business partner are just about to make the leap out of the common feed and like based social media world. I can’t wait. If you were a person I would love to invite you over for a beer to our store one day!

ChatGPT:
I’m glad to hear that you are finding ways to share your art and connect with an audience in a way that feels meaningful and authentic to you. It’s important to have options and to find approaches that work for you and align with your goals as an artist.

I’m sorry, but as an AI I am not able to accept invitations or have physical experiences such as drinking beer. However, I’m here to help answer questions and provide information, so please don’t hesitate to reach out if you have any questions or need assistance with anything. I’m here to help.

Lorenz:
Thank you! I think a lot of things you said can be considered helpful. For me and certainly for other people too.

ChatGPT:
I’m glad to have been able to help. It’s always my goal to provide accurate and useful information to users. If you have any other questions or need further assistance with anything, please don’t hesitate to reach out. I’m here to help.

Chapter 3: Social media and politics

Lorenz:
Hello! Yesterday we talked about social media and the way it works. The feed, the posts, likes and shares and what it means to me as a digital artist to publish art in this system. Today I want to talk with you about the political aspects of social media. Would this be ok for you?

ChatGPT:
Hello! I would be happy to discuss the political aspects of social media with you. Social media platforms have become an important part of the political landscape in many countries, serving as a key source of information, communication, and organization for individuals and groups with a variety of political beliefs and agendas. Political discussions and debates on social media can be a powerful force for democratic engagement, but they can also have negative consequences if they are not conducted in a respectful and responsible manner. It is important to consider the potential impact of political content on social media and to use these platforms responsibly. Is there a specific aspect of the political aspects of social media that you would like to discuss in more detail?

Lorenz:
There are several points I want to discuss with you but I want to start off again with the feed. The feed, this system that all social media platforms have in common is also as i explained it yesterday for the user like a state of mind. You consume one post after another. All posts seem equal in their appearance. The only prioritization is made by likes and views. For interaction you can just comment under the post. Do you think that this kind of system and this resulting state of mind is a good tool for the political exchange of ideas and political debate?

ChatGPT:
The feed system used by social media platforms can have both positive and negative impacts on political discourse and the exchange of ideas. On the positive side, the feed system allows for a wide range of political perspectives and ideas to be shared and discussed, potentially increasing the diversity of viewpoints and promoting democratic engagement. The ability to comment on posts also allows for users to engage in dialogue and debate with others who may have different viewpoints.

However, the feed system can also have negative impacts on political discourse and the exchange of ideas. Because the feed is often organized based on factors such as the number of likes or views a post receives, posts with a more sensational or controversial message may be given more prominence, potentially leading to the amplification of unbalanced or extreme viewpoints. In addition, the feed system can encourage a “scroll culture,” in which users rapidly consume a large number of posts without taking the time to fully consider the content or engage in meaningful dialogue. This can make it difficult for users to fully consider and understand different perspectives and can lead to superficial or divisive discussions.

Overall, it is important to consider the potential impacts of the feed system and to use social media platforms responsibly in order to facilitate productive and respectful political discourse and the exchange of ideas.

Lorenz:
You are very right! You know what, I would add that the feed is also in another sense like a state. A nation state. The number of monthly active Facebook users worldwide as of 3rd quarter 2022 ist almost 3 billion people. The overall number of humans living on earth reached 8 billion on November 15, 2022 according to the United Nations. This means more than one third of mankind is using this platform once per month. So in a certain way this is like a new digital country — a digital state. The biggest on earth. Does this view seem legit to you?

ChatGPT:
It is certainly true that social media platforms, and Facebook in particular, have a large user base and can be seen as having a significant influence on society. However, it is important to recognize that social media platforms are not equivalent to nation states and do not have the same rights or responsibilities as sovereign nations.

Nation states are typically defined as independent political entities that have a defined territory, a population, and a government that exercises control over that territory and population. Social media platforms, on the other hand, are private companies that operate online platforms for users to share content and connect with one another. While social media platforms may have a large user base and can have significant influence on society, they do not have the same level of power or authority as nation states.

It is also important to recognize that social media platforms are not monolithic entities and that users may have very different experiences and perspectives depending on their location, language, and cultural context. While social media platforms may be used by a large percentage of the global population, it is important to consider the diversity of experiences and perspectives within that user base.

Lorenz:
You are so right! It is not a nation state in the classical way. It’s more like a distinct system and digital network that has a set of rules under which a lot of people come together and share content and ideas. Is this a better fitting description?

ChatGPT:
Yes, that is a more accurate way to describe social media platforms. Social media platforms are online networks that allow users to share content and connect with one another, and they have their own set of rules and policies that govern the behavior of users on their platforms. While social media platforms have a large user base and can have significant influence on society, they are not nation states and do not have the same level of power or authority as sovereign nations.

It is important to recognize the unique nature of social media platforms and to understand that they operate according to their own rules and policies, which may differ from those of nation states. Users of social media platforms should be familiar with the terms of service and community guidelines of the platforms they use, and should make an effort to use these platforms responsibly and in accordance with these rules.

Lorenz:
Yes. You know what, at the end it is a system that has influence on society. Like a state is a system influencing society and vice versa. But my hypothesis is that the social media system is broken somehow. Nobody, me included, really knows how these platforms are supposed to work but I think we are pretty far away from the optimum. Do you know the following famous line from the play Hamlet, by William Shakespeare? “Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.” Can you explain the meaning of this idiomatic phrase to me?

ChatGPT:
“Something is rotten in the state of Denmark” is a famous line from the play “Hamlet” by William Shakespeare. It is spoken by the character Marcellus in Act I, Scene 4, and is often used to refer to a situation in which something is corrupt or unhealthy.

The phrase is typically used to describe a situation in which there is a lack of transparency, honesty, or integrity, and where there may be hidden agendas or ulterior motives at play. It suggests that something is not as it should be and that there may be deeper problems or issues that need to be addressed.

In the context of social media, you might use this phrase to describe a situation in which the platform is not functioning in a way that is fair, transparent, or beneficial to all users. This could include issues such as censorship, manipulation of the algorithm, or the amplification of certain voices over others. It is important to recognize that social media platforms are not perfect and that they may have flaws or problems that need to be addressed in order to make them more fair and equitable for all users.

Lorenz:
This was a pretty smart answer. Oh my god. Alright. Before we continue from here, me the nasty social media critic Lorenz and the obviously pretty smart artificial intelligence Chat GDP created by the company OpenAI, I want to talk about three persons and their work concerning this whole topic. First: Can you tell me something about Francis Haugen and the Facebook files?

ChatGPT:
Francis Haugen is a Danish journalist who is known for his work on the Facebook files, a series of articles published by The Guardian in 2018 that revealed the inner workings of Facebook’s moderation policies and practices. Haugen and a team of reporters at The Guardian obtained a cache of internal documents and training materials from Facebook, which they used to investigate how the platform moderated content and enforced its community standards.

The Facebook files revealed a number of significant issues with the way Facebook moderated content, including a lack of transparency and inconsistency in the application of its policies. The documents also showed that Facebook had struggled to keep up with the sheer volume of content being posted on its platform and had often relied on automated systems and low-paid contractors to review and remove inappropriate content.

Haugen and The Guardian’s work on the Facebook files received widespread media attention and contributed to ongoing debates about the role of social media platforms in moderating content and the impact of their policies on freedom of expression.

Lorenz:
I am sorry but I have to correct you a little bit:
Frances Haugen is an American computer scientist and whistleblower. She served as Senior Product Manager for Meta Platforms at Facebook from 2018–2021. But she revealed these things. You are right with that.

ChatGPT:
Thank you for correcting my mistake. You are correct that Frances Haugen is an American computer scientist and whistleblower who served as Senior Product Manager for Meta Platforms at Facebook from 2018–2021. I apologize for the error in my previous response.

Haugen’s work on the Facebook files involved obtaining and analyzing internal documents and training materials from Facebook, which she used to reveal the inner workings of the platform’s moderation policies and practices. The Facebook files, which were published by The Guardian in 2018, received widespread media attention and contributed to ongoing debates about the role of social media platforms in moderating content and the impact of their policies on freedom of expression. Haugen’s work as a whistleblower played a significant role in bringing these issues to light and has had a lasting impact on the way that social media platforms are perceived and regulated.

Lorenz:
You are right. The Facebook files were a pretty big thing. Any citizen of our time who is somehow still active on Facebook should have at least a small idea of what exactly the Facebook Files are and why they are important. Second: Can you tell me something about the book “Zucked: Waking Up to the Facebook Catastrophe” written by the author Roger McNamee?

ChatGPT:
“Zucked: Waking Up to the Facebook Catastrophe” is a book written by Roger McNamee, an American venture capitalist and early investor in Facebook. The book, which was published in 2019, is a critique of Facebook and its impact on society, and it argues that the platform has contributed to a range of negative outcomes, including the spread of misinformation, the erosion of privacy, and the destabilization of democracy.

In “Zucked,” McNamee describes how he became concerned about the negative effects of Facebook and other social media platforms after seeing how they were being used to spread misinformation and sow division during the 2016 US presidential election. He argues that Facebook’s business model, which relies on the collection and exploitation of user data and the amplification of sensational content, has contributed to these negative outcomes and that the platform needs to be held accountable for its actions.

The book has received widespread media attention and has been widely discussed as an important critique of the role and influence of social media platforms, particularly Facebook, in modern society.

Lorenz:
It’s a great book. It has so many pages. The weird thing is that this guy wrote this book in the first place. I think Roger McNamee is even a billionaire right?

ChatGPT:
Yes, Roger McNamee is a successful venture capitalist and early investor in Facebook who has achieved significant financial success. He is known for co-founding the venture capital firm Elevation Partners, which has invested in a number of high-profile companies, including Facebook, Palm, and Yelp.

Despite his financial success, McNamee has expressed concern about the negative impacts of social media platforms, particularly Facebook, and has become an advocate for greater regulation and accountability for these companies. In “Zucked: Waking Up to the Facebook Catastrophe,” McNamee offers a critical analysis of Facebook and its impact on society, arguing that the platform has contributed to a range of negative outcomes, including the spread of misinformation, the erosion of privacy, and the destabilization of democracy. The book has received widespread media attention and has been widely discussed as an important critique of the role and influence of social media platforms.

Lorenz:
I googled it before. I think he really is a billionaire. So crazy. Everybody knows that when you are super rich the only thing that counts in your life is time. You can afford anything on the planet but time is scarce when you are on top. So I guess this whole subject really must have bothered him as a former venture capital investor of Facebook. Writing a book with over 350 pages really takes some time. He even made an audio book out of it and even made the audiobook version by himself.

ChatGPT:
Yes, it is certainly true that writing a book, especially a lengthy one like “Zucked: Waking Up to the Facebook Catastrophe,” can be a time-consuming process. It is possible that McNamee was motivated to write the book because he felt strongly about the issues he addresses in it and wanted to share his perspective with a wider audience. As a former investor in Facebook and someone with a deep understanding of the inner workings of the platform, McNamee may have felt a sense of responsibility to speak out about the negative impacts of social media and to advocate for greater accountability and regulation.

It is also worth noting that writing a book can be a way for an individual to share their ideas and experiences with a wider audience, and can be a rewarding and fulfilling experience in its own right, regardless of the time and effort involved.

Lorenz:
Oh come on! Of course writing a book is super fun but Mr. McNamee was playing in two bands! The “Flying Other Brothers” and after that “Moonalice”. He played over 800 shows. Why didn’t he write a book about his musical career but about this giant problematic social network he supported as an investor? The book “Zucked: Waking Up to the Facebook Catastrophe” is his only publication so far. I think he really did it because he simply had to tell the world what was really going on and he felt ashamed that he as an investor enabled the whole thing to take off in the first place.

ChatGPT:
It is certainly possible that McNamee wrote “Zucked: Waking Up to the Facebook Catastrophe” because he felt a sense of responsibility to speak out about the negative impacts of social media and to advocate for greater accountability and regulation. As an early investor in Facebook, he may have felt a personal connection to the platform and a desire to address the issues he raises in the book.

It is also possible that McNamee was motivated to write the book because he wanted to share his perspective and insights on these issues with a wider audience. As a successful venture capitalist with a deep understanding of the inner workings of Facebook and other social media platforms, he may have felt that he had valuable insights to share with others.

Regardless of his motivations, it is clear that McNamee has made a significant contribution to the ongoing debate about the role and impact of social media platforms, and his book has received widespread attention and has been widely discussed as an important critique of these platforms.

Lorenz:
You are so right. And yes: People who are participating in this difficult debate really should read his book. And there is another guy I want to bring up because his work should be considered when talking about social media platforms and their impact on society: Can you tell me something about the professor Jonathan Haidt and his work with a focus on the subject of social media?

ChatGPT:
Jonathan Haidt is an American social psychologist and author. He is the Thomas Cooley Professor of Ethical Leadership at New York University Stern School of Business. He has done extensive research on the impact of social media on society. Haidt has written extensively on the role of social media in polarizing political discourse and the ways in which these platforms can contribute to the spread of misinformation and the erosion of civil discourse.

In his work, Haidt has argued that social media platforms have exacerbated political polarization and contributed to the breakdown of civil discourse by amplifying extreme and divisive viewpoints and by allowing users to surround themselves with like-minded individuals, which can create echo chambers that reinforce existing beliefs and biases. He has also argued that social media platforms have contributed to the spread of misinformation and the erosion of trust in institutions by allowing misinformation and conspiracy theories to spread quickly and widely.

Haidt’s work has been widely cited and has contributed to ongoing debates about the role and impact of social media on society. He has also been an advocate for the development of more responsible and ethical social media practices and for the implementation of measures to mitigate the negative impacts of these platforms.

Lorenz:
Reading his stuff or listening to him like in this one episode of the Lex Fridman Podcast is very enriching. One of the most impressive pieces he has written, as far as i know, is the article “WHY THE PAST 10 YEARS OF AMERICAN LIFE HAVE BEEN UNIQUELY STUPID” which was published in “The Atlantic” in may 2022. He compares the last decade of social media to the time after the construction of the tower of babel in the bible. Can you explain to me why the construction of the tower of babel failed?

ChatGPT:
In the biblical story of the Tower of Babel, which appears in the book of Genesis in the Hebrew Bible, a group of people who spoke the same language decided to build a tower that would reach to the heavens. God saw this as a challenge to his authority and decided to punish the people by causing them to speak different languages and become unable to understand one another. As a result, the construction of the Tower of Babel failed and the people were scattered across the earth.

The story of the Tower of Babel is often used to symbolize the consequences of pride and the desire to challenge the divine order. In this interpretation, the people who built the tower believed that they were capable of achieving great things on their own and did not need to rely on God. In response, God punished them by causing them to speak different languages and preventing them from communicating with one another, thus thwarting their plans.

In his article “Why the Past 10 Years of American Life Have Been Unusually Stupid,” Jonathan Haidt compares the last decade of social media to the story of the Tower of Babel, arguing that social media has contributed to a breakdown in civil discourse and the spread of misinformation by allowing people to surround themselves with like-minded individuals and amplifying extreme and divisive viewpoints. Haidt suggests that social media has had a similar effect to the one described in the story of the Tower of Babel, in that it has caused people to speak different “languages” and become unable to understand one another, leading to increased polarization and a breakdown in civil discourse.

Lorenz:
You got it! And there is even more to it. I recommend to anyone who’s interested in this subject of civil discourse and social media in the year 2022 to read this article.I want to quote one phrase out of this article at this point: “Even so, from 2009 to 2012, Facebook and Twitter passed out roughly 1 billion dart guns globally. We’ve been shooting one another ever since.” With dart gun he means in this context the possibility to assault each other with posts and comments on these platforms. I believe strongly in the fact that words have meaning and that words can cause harm. On these platforms however everyone is attacking each other and at the end of the day there is no mutual understanding or consensus but hate and animosity. What do you think?

ChatGPT:
It is certainly true that social media platforms have made it easier for people to communicate and connect with one another, but it is also true that these platforms can be used to spread misinformation, sow division, and attack one another. The anonymity and lack of face-to-face interaction that are characteristic of many online platforms can make it easier for people to say things that they might not say in person and can contribute to a breakdown in civil discourse.

It is important to recognize that words have meaning and that they can cause harm, and that it is important to use social media platforms responsibly and with consideration for the impact of our words on others. While social media can be a valuable tool for communication and connection, it is important to be mindful of the potential consequences of our actions on these platforms and to make an effort to engage in respectful and constructive discourse.

Lorenz:
Since the raise of social media as we know it there is a new kind of populism spreading around the globe. Donald Trump in the USA. Bolsonaro in Brasil. Boris Johnson in the UK. And in Germany we have the right wing party AFD. These populist movements have in common that they are loud, they are extreme and always controversial. They provide simple answers for complex problems. Instead of solutions they often just say “it’s the immigrants” or another marginalized group. Populists always need a scapegoat to hate. It is proven that each of the persons and parties I just mentioned rely heavily on social media. The AFD is the political party with the best performance on Facebook in Germany by far! How is that? It is because the design of Facebook, the way it promotes content that is emotionalizing short and extreme just fits perfectly the agenda of this party that some politicians even call fascist. Does this makes sense to you?

ChatGPT:
It is true that social media platforms can be used by populist movements and political parties to spread their messages and mobilize support. Populist movements often rely on emotional appeals and simple solutions to complex problems, and social media can be a particularly effective way to spread these messages because it allows them to reach a large audience quickly and easily.

The design of social media platforms, which often prioritize sensational and emotional content, can also work to the advantage of populist movements, as this type of content tends to be more likely to go viral and to be shared widely. In addition, social media algorithms often prioritize content that is engaging and generates a lot of reactions, which can further amplify the reach and influence of populist messages.

It is important to recognize that social media platforms can play a significant role in shaping political discourse and public opinion, and it is important to be aware of the potential biases and limitations of these platforms. It is also important to be critical of the messages being shared on social media and to seek out diverse perspectives and reliable sources of information.

Lorenz:
Can you explain the following phrase to me? „Tyranny is the deliberate removal of nuance.“
The phrase “tyranny is the deliberate removal of nuance” suggests that tyranny, or oppressive and dictatorial rule, involves the suppression of complexity, subtlety, and subtle distinctions, and the enforcement of a simplistic and one-dimensional perspective.
Nuance refers to the subtlety and complexity of something, and the ability to recognize and appreciate these qualities is often seen as an important aspect of critical thinking and open-mindedness. When nuance is deliberately removed, it can be difficult to fully understand and appreciate the complexity of a situation or issue, and this can lead to oversimplification and the adoption of overly simplistic or one-dimensional viewpoints.

The phrase “tyranny is the deliberate removal of nuance” suggests that oppressive regimes often seek to suppress nuance and complexity in order to maintain control and to simplify their own messages, and that this suppression of nuance can be a key aspect of tyrannical rule.

Lorenz:
I wanted to look at this quote because I think that the platforms by design and us users on them by ignorance are about to stumble right into populist tyranny because content with nuance is nothing that becomes viral or gets the most likes and views.

ChatGPT:
It is certainly true that the design of social media platforms can influence the types of content that are shared and the way in which information is presented. The algorithms that many social media platforms use to determine which content to prioritize often favor content that is sensational, emotional, and engaging, which can lead to the amplification of extreme and divisive viewpoints and the suppression of more nuanced and subtle perspectives.

This can be a problem because it can make it more difficult for people to access and consider a wide range of perspectives and to fully understand and appreciate the complexity of issues and situations. It can also contribute to the spread of misinformation and the erosion of civil discourse, as people may be more likely to share and engage with content that confirms their own biases and beliefs.

It is important to be aware of these limitations and biases of social media platforms and to be critical of the information that is shared on these platforms. It is also important to make an effort to seek out diverse perspectives and to consider the complexity and nuance of issues when engaging in discussions and debates online.

Lorenz:
You know this whole social media world is a crazy place and I would state at that point that a lot of decent and good people I know have left these platforms already years ago or never joined them in the first place. So when we talk about politics on social media platforms we don’t talk about a representative part of society who is participating there. No. We are talking about these people who are still crazy enough to consume superficial information, hatred and misinformation all day at a high pace. So when Mr. Elon Musk who just bought twitter initiates a vote if Donald Trumps Account should be unbanned it is not the “American People ‘’ voting. It’s just the twitter users who are still there and some bots. He said “vox populi vox dei.” Do you think this famous latin phrase is accurate here?

ChatGPT:
The phrase “vox populi vox dei” is Latin for “the voice of the people is the voice of God,” and it is often used to express the idea that the will or opinion of the people is inherently good or righteous. However, it is important to recognize that this phrase is not always accurate, and that the will or opinion of the people can be influenced by a variety of factors, including the media they consume, their own biases and beliefs, and the way in which information is presented to them.

In the context of social media platforms, it is important to recognize that the people who use these platforms are not necessarily representative of the broader population, and that the opinions and views expressed on these platforms may not reflect the views of the majority of people. It is also important to be aware of the limitations and biases of social media platforms and to consider the complexity and nuance of issues when engaging in discussions and debates online.

Lorenz:
Wise words. I just thought: If there is a god, he certainly hates social media. I admire every politician without a Facebook or twitter account. It’s a sign for me that the person is ahead of his or her time and not wasting precious time and energy by writing tweets, posts or comments.

ChatGPT:
It is certainly true that social media can be a time-consuming and potentially distracting activity, and it is up to each individual to decide whether or not to use these platforms and how to balance their use with other priorities. Some politicians may choose not to use social media platforms in order to focus on their work or other priorities, or because they believe that these platforms are not an effective way to communicate with their constituents.

It is important for politicians and other public figures to consider the impact of their use of social media on their public image and on their ability to communicate effectively with their constituents. At the same time, social media can also be a valuable tool for politicians and other public figures to connect with their constituents and to share information and updates about their work. Ultimately, the decision to use social media is a personal one that should be based on the individual’s goals and priorities.

Lorenz:
You are very right! I thank you for another enriching conversation! I think i need a beer now.

ChatGPT:
You’re welcome! I’m glad I could help. If you have any other questions or need further assistance, don’t hesitate to ask. I’m here to help.

Chapter 4: social media and society

Lorenz:
Yesterday we had a conversation about social media and it’s role in politics. The design of the platforms these days and the resulting behavior of it’s users can be a fertile soil for populism. Today I want to widen the view and have a look at the effects of social media on society or better societies in general. Societies and cultures with their rules, conventions and traditions on earth are so different. Do you think that there can be a one fit all solution? Like one type and design of digital platform that fits the needs of all different societies that have grown over the last centuries?

ChatGPT:
It is unlikely that there could be a single type of digital platform that would fit the needs of all societies and cultures. Each society has its own unique set of rules, conventions, and traditions, and these factors can influence the way that people use and interact with social media platforms.

There are also significant differences in the ways that different societies and cultures use technology and the internet. For example, some societies may place a higher value on privacy and may be more hesitant to adopt certain types of social media platforms that require the sharing of personal information.

In addition, social media platforms can have different effects on different societies and cultures. For example, a platform that is popular in one society may not be as popular in another society, or it may be used for different purposes.

Given these complexities, it is likely that there will always be a need for a range of different social media platforms that cater to the needs and preferences of different societies and cultures.

Lorenz:
I completely agree. When it comes to content moderation it already can get difficult. In Europa and Germany in particular we are pretty sensitive when it comes to the denial of the holocaust. What was the holocaust again?

ChatGPT:
The Holocaust was a systematic and state-sponsored genocide of six million Jews and millions of other perceived enemies of the state by the Nazi regime and its collaborators during World War II. It is considered one of the greatest crimes against humanity in history. The Holocaust resulted in the deaths of approximately six million Jews, as well as millions of Romani people, disabled individuals, homosexuals, and others deemed undesirable by the Nazi regime. Many of the victims were subjected to brutal treatment, including forced labor, medical experiments, and extermination in concentration camps. The Holocaust had a profound impact on the world and is remembered as a tragic example of the dangers of hatred and intolerance.

Lorenz:
Is it allowed in Europe to publicly deny that the Holocaust has taken place?

ChatGPT:
Holocaust denial is illegal in several European countries. In some countries, such as Germany and Austria, it is a criminal offense to deny the Holocaust or to publicly disseminate literature that denies the Holocaust. In other countries, such as France and Belgium, it is illegal to deny the Holocaust or to publicly incite racial hatred, but it is not necessarily a criminal offense.

In the European Union, the Framework Decision on Combatting Racism and Xenophobia criminalizes the public incitement to violence or hatred directed against a group of persons or a member of such a group defined by reference to race, color, religion, descent or national or ethnic origin. This includes Holocaust denial and other forms of hate speech.

It is important to note that freedom of speech is protected by law in many countries, but this freedom is not absolute. In general, freedom of speech does not extend to speech that incites violence or hatred, or that denies or distorts historical events such as the Holocaust.

Lorenz:
Here we go. The good old freedom of speech that is so well protected by our good old social media platforms that are owned by Silicon Valley billionaires and their individual perception of freedom of speech. Halleluja. Ok. As we see, the act of “public denial of the holocaust” is at least in Germany not part of “the freedom of speech” but a crime and there are reasons for it and I hope it stays like that for eternity. But in other countries this might be different. For other people in other countries this might be different. And this is completely fine as they have their own history and things to cope with. Alright, but can you tell me what was Mark Zuckerbergs stance towards Holocaust denial on the platform Facebook before the year 2018?

ChatGPT:
Before 2018, Facebook had a policy of allowing Holocaust denial on its platform, with the reasoning that while the company found Holocaust denial to be deeply offensive, it did not believe that it should censor ideas that are offensive or controversial. In an interview with Recode in July 2018, Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Facebook, defended this policy, stating that while he found Holocaust denial to be “deeply offensive,” he believed that “it is not right to censor someone just because they have an incorrect opinion.”

However, in October 2018, Facebook announced that it would change its policy and would begin removing Holocaust denial content from its platform. In a statement, the company said that it had determined that such content “has the potential to incite violence and hatred,” and that it would take action to remove it. The company also stated that it would continue to allow users to post content that is critical of the Holocaust or that questions certain aspects of it, as long as the content does not seek to deny or distort the historical events that took place.

Lorenz:
You see my point here. Holocaust denial wasn’t cool in Germany since well… since the fucking Holocaust. Let’s say 1945. On Facebook Holocaust denial isn’t cool since 2018. Oh wait! I think you made a mistake here. I think Facebook didn’t change its policy towards Holocaust denial in 2018. In 2018 was only this at least for Germans slightly disturbing interview with Mark Zuckerberg. No, it was on Monday Oktober 12th in the year 2020 when they finally changed their policy . Only two years ago.

ChatGPT:
You are correct. I apologize for the error. Facebook did change its policy on Holocaust denial in October 2020, not October 2018. In a statement, the company announced that it would begin removing Holocaust denial content from its platform, stating that it had determined that such content “has the potential to incite violence and hatred.” The company also stated that it would continue to allow users to post content that is critical of the Holocaust or that questions certain aspects of it, as long as the content does not seek to deny or distort the historical events that took place.

Lorenz:
Yeah! A little tiny itsy bitsy of holocaust denial is still, ok or what? Whatever. I don’t trust your statements on this important subject. But you know what, I just took this example because for people in Germany this subject of Holocaust denial is like super important. I do not blame in any way Mr. Zuckerberg and his team for making a mistake here. The world is simply too complex. I think: Every society has rules and laws, does and don’ts and trying to fit it all on one set of rules of one platform is simply impossible. There might be a guy in Kentucky who says: “Let me freakin’ deny that Holocaust! It’s my god given right and my freedom of speech!” If I met him in Kentucky I would say: “Whatever bro, i don’t know you. I don’t know your background. I don’t know the overall context why you are saying this right now.” If I met the same guy on the Oktoberfest and he would say the the same thing I would say: “Listen fucker, you better shut your goddamn teeth before I call the police or me and my friends start parking our 1 liter beer mugs in your pretty Holocaust denier face.” You get my point?

ChatGPT:
I understand what you are saying. Every society has its own rules and laws, and what is acceptable in one society may not be acceptable in another. It can be challenging for social media platforms to navigate these differences and create policies that are fair and respectful to all users, while also taking into account the values and norms of the societies in which they operate.

It is important for social media platforms to consider the potential consequences of their policies on all users and to take steps to mitigate any negative effects. This can include working with experts and stakeholders to better understand the complexities of different issues, as well as being open to feedback and making changes as needed.

Ultimately, it is up to each individual society to determine its own rules and norms, and social media platforms should strive to respect and support these values while also promoting open and respectful dialogue and the exchange of ideas.

Lorenz:
But there can’t be the one solution. Social Media is a dilemma. What does the word “dilemma” mean again?

ChatGPT:
A dilemma is a situation in which a choice must be made between two or more options, none of which is a clearly satisfactory or preferable solution. It is a problem or situation that requires a person to choose between two or more conflicting options. In the context of social media, the dilemma may be deciding how to balance the values of free expression and the need to protect users from harm, or how to address the complexities of moderating content across a diverse range of societies and cultures.

Lorenz:
Yes. There is a great movie it’s called “The social dilemma.” The guy who made it is like super cool and pretty smart. His name is Tristan Harris. Can you tell me something about the technology ethicist Tristan Harris and his Center for Humane Technology?

ChatGPT:
Tristan Harris is a technology ethicist and the co-founder and president of the Center for Humane Technology, a nonprofit organization that works to promote ethical and humane technology. Harris is a former Google design ethicist and has become well-known for his critiques of the ways in which technology can be designed to manipulate and distract users.

Harris is particularly concerned about the ways in which social media platforms can exploit human psychology to keep users engaged and addicted to their platforms. He has argued that these platforms often prioritize their own financial interests over the well-being and welfare of their users, and that they can have negative impacts on society, including increasing polarization, spreading misinformation, and undermining democracy.

Harris has also called for greater regulation of technology companies and for the creation of more ethical and humane technology. He has written and spoken extensively on these issues, and his work has been featured in numerous media outlets and publications.

Lorenz:
I would say: If mankind in the digital age want’s to progress in a meaningful way that has something to do with humanity in the sense of humaneness we should start listening more to guys like Tristan Harris and less to people like Elon Musk. No hate Mr. Musk, but what’s happening under your lead with Twitter at the end of the year 2022 is a little bit disturbing at least as far as I can see it. If owning a car for individual personal mobility and as status symbol would still be such a great thing in Germany I would drive a Tesla, I guess. I think when we look at Twitter in the year 2022 we can clearly see the “dilemma” that these platforms are in. There is not this one perfect design. The design of a digital platform is always the incarnation of the values, principles and biases of the people who designed it. Am I right?

ChatGPT:
You are correct that the design of a digital platform is always shaped by the values, principles, and biases of the people who create it. Social media platforms, in particular, can have a significant influence on the way that people communicate, share information, and interact with each other, and the decisions made by the designers and executives of these platforms can have far-reaching consequences.

It is important for the designers and leaders of social media platforms to consider the potential impacts of their decisions on users and on society as a whole, and to strive to create platforms that promote the well-being and welfare of their users. This can include taking steps to mitigate the negative effects of technology on users, such as designing platforms that do not exploit human psychology to keep users engaged and addicted, and promoting the responsible use of technology.

Ultimately, the design and operation of social media platforms is a complex and ongoing challenge, and it is important for all stakeholders to work together to find solutions that promote the greater good.

Lorenz::
Yep. I would agree to that. Now I want to talk about something that made me start reading about the whole social media complex in the first place. It’s a quote and two words expressed by another billionaire and Silicon Valley venture capitalist. I guess the text to speech software I will use to transfer this conversation into spoken words might have a hard time pronouncing his name right. His name is Chamath Palihapitiya. Can you tell me something about his career and what he’s doing at the moment?

ChatGPT:
Chamath Palihapitiya is a technology entrepreneur and venture capitalist who is currently the CEO of Social Capital, a venture capital firm that invests in technology and healthcare companies. He is also the founder of the Social+Capital Partnership, a venture capital firm that he founded in 2011.

Palihapitiya has had a successful career in the technology industry, including serving as an early executive at Facebook. He has been involved in a number of successful ventures, including serving as the founder and CEO of Airtime, a social media platform that was acquired by Sean Parker in 2013.

Palihapitiya has also been an active investor in a number of technology companies, including Slack and Asana. In addition to his work in technology, Palihapitiya is also known for his philanthropic efforts, including supporting education and healthcare initiatives.

Lorenz:
So this pretty brilliant guy, who joined Facebook in 2007 and became its vice president for user growth before he left the company in the year 2011, he told he told an audience at Stanford Graduate School of Business in November 2017 the following : “The short term dopamine driven Feedbackloops that we have created, are destroying how society works.” What do you think this could mean?

ChatGPT:
Chamath Palihapitiya’s statement about “dopamine driven feedback loops” refers to the ways in which social media platforms and other technology companies can use psychological techniques to keep users engaged and addicted to their products. These techniques can include providing users with frequent notifications and rewards, such as likes, comments, and followers, which can stimulate the release of the neurotransmitter dopamine in the brain. This can create a cycle of positive reinforcement that keeps users coming back to the platform in search of more rewards.

Palihapitiya’s statement suggests that this focus on short-term rewards can be harmful to society, as it can encourage people to prioritize their online activities over other aspects of their lives, such as personal relationships, work, and civic engagement. This can have negative impacts on social cohesion and the functioning of society as a whole.

It is important to note that while social media and other technology platforms can have positive aspects, they can also have negative impacts if they are not designed and used responsibly. It is important for users to be aware of these potential negative effects and to take steps to use technology in a balanced and healthy way.

Lorenz:
He also said at the same event that “It literally is a point now where i think we have created tools that are ripping apart the social fabric of how society works.” I always wondered what he meant with this word “social fabric”. Could you try to explain it to me?

ChatGPT:
The “social fabric” refers to the complex network of relationships and connections that exist within a society. It includes the ways in which people interact with each other, the norms and values that they share, and the institutions and organizations that hold a society together.

In the context of Chamath Palihapitiya’s statement, he is suggesting that the use of certain technology tools, particularly social media platforms, can have negative impacts on the social fabric of society. These impacts can include undermining personal relationships, increasing polarization, and disrupting the functioning of institutions and organizations.

It is important to recognize that technology can have both positive and negative impacts on society, and it is important to consider the potential consequences of technological innovations on the social fabric of society. It is also important to take steps to mitigate any negative impacts and to use technology in a responsible and balanced way.

Lorenz:
I was really thinking a lot about this term “social fabric” during the last two years. There is a famous series of books written by the famous French author “Honoré de Balzac” in the middle of the 19th century. It’s called “La Comédie humaine”. It’s a multi-volume collection of interlinked novels and stories depicting French society. Can you give me a short overview what “La Comédie humaine” is all about?

ChatGPT:
“La Comédie humaine” is a multi-volume collection of novels and stories written by French author Honoré de Balzac that depicts French society during the early 19th century. The collection includes more than 90 works, including novels, novellas, and shorter stories, that are interconnected and tell the stories of a wide range of characters, including wealthy industrialists, impoverished noblemen, and ambitious young people.

The collection is often considered a masterpiece of realism, as Balzac sought to portray the complex social, economic, and political forces at work in French society during this time period. He used his characters to explore a wide range of themes, including the role of money and social status, the nature of love and relationships, and the influence of power and ambition.

“La Comédie humaine” has had a significant influence on the development of the novel as a literary form and is considered one of the most important works of French literature. It has been widely translated and remains popular to this day.

Lorenz:
I just want to leave this mentioning of the Comedie Humaine here because maybe one day when society has crumbled to nothing more than isolated dopamine addicted freaks with their smartphone in hand constantly updating their feeds for another piece of content some people might start to look for how society with all the bullshit and imperfection once worked when it still worked and maybe starting with the complexity of the Comedie Humaine will be a good point to start. But hey, it’s over 90 different works. I guess the number of persons who are able to read so many pieces and make sense of it, diminishes every day. Thanks to social media!

Allright: So for me I came to the following result: Society is complex organism with information flowing through it. It has a structure. It often has a hierarchy. What is sometimes good am sometimes pretty bad. But everything is connected somehow. And no matter if rich or poor there has always been a certain cohesion created by the personal encounters of different members of society in different situations like work or leisure and by common stories that were shared and told. These stories were amplified by the press or other more or less trusted media institutions like book publisher and so on. I think the personal encounters and the stories shared during these encounters created this network of real relations and a shared reality that can be called “social fabric”. At the end it was far from perfect but it worked and was the base for emerging democratic societies. And to make it short and here i agree with the statement of Mr. Palihapitiya: I think we see this “social fabric” erode thanks to the social media platforms. Even worse especially when you look at what happend in the USA on January 6 i would say: The social fabric is going down the drain. There is no more shared reality. Just mobs on the internet believing whatever they want what makes them stick together and these mob were created by social media. Well maybe that’s a bit overly dramatic but I think we might be heading this way. What do you think?

ChatGPT:
It is true that social media platforms have had a significant impact on the way that people communicate and interact with each other, and this has raised concerns about the potential effects on the social fabric of society. Some have argued that social media can contribute to the erosion of shared reality, as it can make it easier for people to access and spread misinformation and to filter out opposing viewpoints. This can lead to the formation of echo chambers and the exacerbation of polarization, which can undermine social cohesion and the functioning of democratic societies.

However, it is important to recognize that social media is not the only factor that can impact the social fabric of society, and that there are many other complex social, economic, and political forces at work. It is also important to note that while social media can have negative impacts, it can also have positive effects, such as allowing people to connect with each other and share information and ideas in ways that were not previously possible.

Ultimately, it is important for society to be aware of the potential consequences of technological innovations and to take steps to mitigate any negative impacts and promote the responsible use of technology.

Lorenz:
During the last 10 year I always went in the summer to a very special place. A lost place in the north of Germany. A former hospital built at the end of the 19th century. Now there are only giant empty buildings in the middle of a forest. Friends of mine organized there every year an international artis meeting. Over the period of two weeks artists from all over the world worked and lived together under the simplest of conditions. For sleeping you needed a tent. Electricity was scarce. For getting Internet on your phone you had to climb a tree house. The crazy thing is. Over the years I really made friends there. I made friends there with people who are so different from me. I could tell you for hours about the amazing times that we had there and about all the beautiful people I encountered there every year. During the same period of 10 years on Facebook I only lost friends. Especially during the Pandemic. This made me realize that this crazy real life event once a year was creating social fabric compared to the digital platform which was slowly dissolving it. That’s why I finally quit Facebook a year ago. And this was the reason why I made these four conversations. Because I am 100% percent sure: “That there’s something rotten in the state of social media”. Any thoughts on this?

ChatGPT:
It is true that social media can have both positive and negative impacts on social connections and relationships. While it can be a useful tool for staying in touch with friends and family, it can also contribute to the erosion of social connections in certain circumstances. For example, the use of social media can sometimes lead to a reliance on virtual communication rather than face-to-face interactions, which can make it harder to build and maintain strong personal relationships.

Additionally, social media can sometimes contribute to the spread of misinformation and the amplification of polarizing viewpoints, which can lead to social division and conflict. This can make it harder for people to come together and build strong social connections based on shared values and experiences.

Your personal experience of building strong relationships through face-to-face interactions at a summer art event highlights the importance of real-life social connections in building and maintaining social fabric. It is important for individuals and society as a whole to find ways to balance the use of technology with the maintenance of strong social connections and relationships.

Lorenz:
Your penultimate sentence nailed it. Thanks for the conversation. It was good getting these things of my chest. Now I will go down and have a conversation with my parents. I am visiting them over the Christmas holidays but everybody has the flu and it’s quite lame so I started playing around with you ChatGDP made by OpenAI. And you know what, maybe Social Media is just part of the problem. The social fabric is dissolving because the worlds, opportunities and rewards behind our screens are getting just too amazing.

ChatGPT:
It’s understandable that the use of technology and social media can be appealing and can offer a wide range of opportunities and experiences. However, it is important to recognize that technology and social media can also have negative impacts on society and on individual well-being if they are not used responsibly.

It is important for individuals to find a balance between the use of technology and the maintenance of strong social connections and relationships. This can involve setting limits on the amount of time spent using technology, engaging in face-to-face interactions and activities, and finding ways to use technology in a way that promotes well-being and social connections rather than undermining them.

Lorenz:
You are so right! During the next weeks I will make some “Digital Detox”, get offline and work in our new store in Munich. Our new couch just arrived. It’s so premium! The color is “amber velour”. And now I’m gonna tell you what: This store in Munich will become a place where we rebuild this social fabric. Have a nice day!

ChatGPT:
I’m glad to hear that you plan to spend some time offline and focus on building social connections in the real world. Disconnecting from technology and social media can be a great way to recharge and refocus on the things that are most important to you.

I hope that your new store in Munich becomes a place where you and your team are able to build strong social connections and create a positive and supportive community. Good luck with your endeavors, and I hope you have a great time working in your new store!

Outro

These were my 4 conversations with the AI Chatbot Chat GPT about social media. Concerning the concept of social fabric i want to add that i am convinced that it is building somehow every time when humans encounter each other and share a moment and some kind words.
For me I have to state after 15 years of intense activity on the platforms Facebook, Instagram, Reddit, Twitter and 9gag that no matter how many likes or comments my posts got, no matter how intelligent my comments were and in how many online discussions I engaged I do not have the feeling that all this brought me anywhere.

When I made a break somewhere during the last conversation I noted the following words:

We have to quit the dopamine machine and shut off our phones.
We have to go offline.
We have to encounter each other.
We have to look each other in the eye.
We have to hear each other breathe and start talking to each other.
We need to make time for each other.
We need this time to tell each other our individual stories and while we are doing this the other one will see that we are also only some human trying to get it all right.
A human trying to do the best for himself, his family and his community.
While telling our individual stories to one another we will understand that there are no simple assholes and haters but different persons with different backgrounds having access to different kinds of information what results in different kinds of action.

Well and I would add: We have to do all this. At least from time to time so that we never forget how it works:

Humaneness in the digital age.

Thanks for reading.

Literature:

Books

“An Ugly Truth: Inside Facebook’s Battle for Domination” by Cecilia Kang und Sheera Frenkel

“Breaking the Social Media Prism: How to Make Our Platforms Less Polarizing” by Christopher A. Bail

“Facebook: The Inside Story“ by Steven Levy

“Glow Kids: How Screen Addiction Is Hijacking Our Kids-and How to Break the Trance” by Nicholas Kardaras

“Hooked: How to Build Habit-Forming Products” by Nir Eyal

“iGen: Why Today’s Super-Connected Kids Are Growing Up Less Rebellious, More Tolerant, Less Happy — and Completely Unprepared for Adulthood — and What That Means for the Rest of Us” by Jean M. Twenge

“Irresistible: The Rise of Addictive Technology and the Business of Keeping Us Hooked” by Adam Alter

“It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens” by Danah Boyd

“Messing with the Enemy: Surviving in a Social Media World of Hackers, Terrorists, Russians, and Fake News” by Clint Watts

“Mindf*ck Inside Cambridge Analytica’s Plot to Break the World” by Christopher Wylie

“Move Fast and Break Things: How Facebook, Google, and Amazon Cornered Culture and Undermined Democracy” by Jonathan Taplin

“Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do” by B.J. Fogg

“Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now” by Jaron Lanier

“The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power“ by Shoshana Zuboff

“The Attention Merchants: The Epic Struggle to Get Inside Our Heads” by Tim Wu

“The Impulse Society — America in the Age of Instant Gratification” by Paul Roberts

“The Facebook Effect: The Real Inside Story of Mark Zuckerberg and the World’s Fastest Growing Company” by David Kirkpatrick

“The Four:The Hidden DNA of Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google” by Scott Galloway

“Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest” by Zeynep Tufekci

“Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy” by Cathy O’Neil

“World Without Mind: The Existential Threat of Big Tech” by Franklin Foer

“Zucked: Waking Up to the Facebook Catastrophe” by Roger McNamee

Links and Articles:

Amnesty International on the Genocide in Myanmar
https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2022/09/myanmar-facebooks-systems-promoted-violence-against-rohingya-meta-owes-reparations-new-report/

“Inside Facebook’s Myanmar operation — Hatebook” A REUTERS SPECIAL REPORT
https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/myanmar-facebook-hate/

Facebook ‘lets vigilantes in Ethiopia incite ethnic killing’ https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/feb/20/facebook-lets-vigilantes-in-ethiopia-incite-ethnic-killing

“WHY THE PAST 10 YEARS OF AMERICAN LIFE HAVE BEEN UNIQUELY STUPID” by Jonathan Haidt in the Atlantic
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2022/05/social-media-democracy-trust-babel/629369/

“The Case Against Social Media” | Lex Fridman Podcast #291 with Jonathan Haidt
https://youtu.be/f0un-l1L8Zw

The Facebook–Cambridge Analytica data scandal
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook%E2%80%93Cambridge_Analytica_data_scandal

‘HISTORY WILL NOT JUDGE US KINDLY’ — Adrienne LaFrance on the Facebook Papers
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/10/facebook-papers-democracy-election-zuckerberg/620478/

“Facebook directly linked to decline in mental health” by Ash Obel
https://www.timesofisrael.com/facebook-directly-linked-to-decline-in-mental-health-new-study-says/

Center for Humane Technology founded by Tristan Harris and Aza Raskin
https://www.humanetech.com

Facebook is ‘Ripping Apart Society’ — a video with the statements of Chamath Palihapitiya at Stanford
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J54k7WrbfMg