You know, this is funny because my elementary school teacher taught me to always attribute sources…
Willi Kampmann

  • ***** “ According to Mother Jones” *****

A far left, severely hostile to Trump organization, that to a far lefty is a reliable source?

So you have public statements as well as those women who have worked with Trump and even those sometimes critical of Trump saying he supported women, so where is your problem? Trump even had a woman in charge of supervising the building of some of his biggest buildings, calling her a “killer”.

In the washington post story that was fairly critical of Trump, Louise Sunshine spoke of a picture Trump kept of her to remind him that she was not perfect but she also said this of him:

“From the standpoint of being a woman, I just thought he was phenomenal,” said Sunshine, 74. “So supportive and encouraging. . . . He gave me the ropes, and I could either hang myself or prove myself.”

From all reports, Trump never treated women any different than men, he gave them a chance long before it was a trend to add some women and minorities for political reasons. What Trump would not do is treat them as weak or needing special help, if they could compete against the men they were hired, and that is the way it should be in my opinion.

You also dodged the fact women are paid less in the Obama Administration and the Clinton foundation. To be honest I do not care much about what percentage of women either have, women do not tend to even want careers in certain fields so if an industry is dominated by mostly men in the trenches, it stands to reason there will be mostly men in leadership roles. But how are they paid? Why pay women way, way less than men? That seems like a great question for Obama and Hillary who both pay their women much less than men and it is a fair standard to hold Trump to when we see how his Administration deals with their pay of women and men in his Administration.

By the way, another reason I do not feed the lazy is they are not even taking the discussion seriously, you put in time and energy and even if I do not agree with you, I respect you for taking the points seriously and doing your part to add content and substance to the discussion. For someone like you I will join you in the middle, but for the lazy I will not.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.