This story is unavailable.

Again, for the mentally challenged, normal business exchanges that trade goods and services for payment are not a violation of the Emoluments clause. The Emoluments clause is specifically created as a counter to “Bribery”, not business.

If you can show that Trump was getting twice as much as a good or service was valued at then maybe you would have a cause under the Emoluments clause because maybe that is someone trying to hide Bribery inside a business transaction, but so far there is nothing being shown as evidence that Trump has been part of any transaction that would trigger the Emoluments clause.

Facts are facts, all these claims are 100% emotion based on hate.

Like what you read? Give Louis Weeks a round of applause.

From a quick cheer to a standing ovation, clap to show how much you enjoyed this story.