is that how you reach your conclusions?
Rick Infinity

And what do you think changed? There was still a “NET GAIN” instead of a loss as the climate alarmists try to claim, that is what they said:

there, we see an ice gain that exceeds the losses in the other areas.

So a net gain, I know hard facts that do not match your political ideology are scary to you but I think even you can understand the concept of a “NET GAIN”.

Like what you read? Give Louis Weeks a round of applause.

From a quick cheer to a standing ovation, clap to show how much you enjoyed this story.