But in this case no one at least in the study is trying to censor, it was a study on what was said…
Graham Skelly
1

But in this case no one at least in the study is trying to censor, it was a study on what was said, and it could be noted that if you like what was said then maybe you were happy with the study. The Study didn’t claim motive, it noticed a change, that is all

Bull, I keep saying this and you keep ignoring it. This is how you show you still have far left debate tactics of ignoring valid points.

I just said one of the far left tactics is to name call in an attempt to force their target to self-censor. In this case they are labeling certain people and commentary as racist, exactly what I pointed out and called out and she exploded on me and called me a racist about.

Maybe because you are on the right, you notice every time someone tries to censor and name call more then I do. But my experience being on the left and I notice all the right wing hate that comes my way when I try and talk, all the dismissive language, “Communist,” “White Genocide” “Anti Christ” “Libtard” and it goes on and on.

You are being disingenuous.

Calling you a socialist is not even in the same world as calling me a racist. You can’t compare the two. Today the racial code word being spammed by you guys is “White Supremacist”. We see it not just from the radicals but these terms are used thousands of times on the mainstream Liberal media.

I see you also dodged my point ab out the shootings, the attacks on conservative speakers, the rioting and constant flow of never ending hate filled protests, all of that proves there is nothing similar on the Right, not even close.

If you refuse to admit to even those basic truths then my point is made.

Show your support

Clapping shows how much you appreciated Louis Weeks’s story.