This story is unavailable.

Wait a second, didn’t NASA release a study showing that there is a net “GAIN” of ice in the Antarctic? Let me Google that:

“Our main disagreement is for East Antarctica and the interior of West Antarctica — there, we see an ice gain that exceeds the losses in the other areas.”

My main issue with these climate alarmists is all of their computer models have a 100% failure rate (so far) and none of their predictions have come true. I am actually old enough to remember the first big predictions and how all of their computer models said if we reached a certain level of Co2 in the atmosphere there would be a “domino” effect that would result in a 5 degree sudden Global warming and a massive melting of the ice caps killing all the polar bears and all sorts of nasty stuff.

Well boys and girls, not only did we reach that “magic number” of Co2 in our atmosphere, we have past that number and left it far into the distant past and still, the polar bears have not died off yet, and oh ya, they predicted Florida would be gone already, it does not look gone to me considering I live here, lol.

I have been going to the same coastal pier I went to as a child 40 years ago and guess what, nothing has changed.

So yes I accept that experimental science is not a perfect thing, and they still have a long way to go but as long as their computer models maintain their 100% failure rate, I will remain skeptical as to what degree they really understand what is going on.

Like what you read? Give Louis Weeks a round of applause.

From a quick cheer to a standing ovation, clap to show how much you enjoyed this story.