This debate can be easily solved. If you don’t want guns, don’t have one. If you want guns, have one.
Why it is not acceptable for anti-gun activists?
Because the problem is that the anti-gun side want to press the gun people to do something what they do not want (is it constitutional, or is it in line with any liberal thinking?) and not pro-gun guys are pushing anti-gun pussies to carry a gun!
They are just defending their basic rights, defending their basic rights planned to be revoked by the other side.