“If we can set it up so you can’t unlock your phone unless you’ve got the right fingerprint, why…
Mr. Bennett
434

“Tell me, would you buy a fire extinguisher that requires you to unlock it with your fingerprint before you use it?”

My fire extinguishers have a disposable pin that you have to pull to prevent accidental discharge.

This type of trigger-safety a good match for a fire extinguisher, because the consequences of accidentally discharging a fire extinguisher is generally non-fatal: a trip to the hardware store, and a few dollars out of pocket. On the other hand, the consequences of a random person using the fire extinguisher is likely to save tens of thousands of dollars.

Applying the same logic to the trigger-safety of a firearm comes out with a very different answer. Accidental discharges of firearms can be as lethal as a fire, and far more rapidly — so the risk-balance here is very different than it is for a fire extinguisher. Also, while a firearm can be relatively safe in the hands of a person with a working conscience and a working understanding of gun safety, they’re incredibly dangerous in clueless or malicious hands. I mean, seriously would you hand a loaded gun to every person who visits your home? Would you hand loaded a fire extinguisher to every person who visits your home? The answer is obvious — nobody hands a loaded gun to somebody until they’ve assed their ability to handle it safely.

Authenticating the user of the gun before allowing it to fire seems like a way to have your cake and eat it to in terms of the safety and utility of the device.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.