The Equal Protection argument against “winner take all” in the Electoral College

Thank you for your detailed explanation and article. A feature of the United States that I find significant (as compared with other countries) is the notion of the balancing of power between the federal and state government bodies. Unless I am missing something, allowing the state to determine allocation methodologies of electoral votes is a feature of that system.

It seems to me that the Electoral College, as it is now, is a balancing feature, designed specifically to counter balance against the tyranny of the majority, and works quite well, much like the proportional and non-proportional make up of Congress.

My understanding is that electoral policies are handled at the state level, couldn’t then a state vote to change their policy? If they don’t want to have WTA, then they could determine that for themselves. Or is my understanding incorrect?

Show your support

Clapping shows how much you appreciated Lynn Fredricks’s story.