I like this site a lot, and have from the beginning. One thing I really appreciate is how widely you all read across the internet, and point your readers to articles we wouldn’t necessarily come across on our own. But if I can offer some feedback: you guys don’t do a very good job of summarizing those articles. We don’t always have the time or inclination to click on the links you provide to read the full story in question, so it would be nice if you could just give more explanatory detail. Like, why did she think the government owed her money? Why did they disagree? How did she prove them wrong? Those seem like easy enough questions to have answered without needing to go to the Post.