Who Were Real Butchers Of Bucha?

Magistr Teologii
5 min readApr 19, 2022

--

In the comments to my previous article, many people wrote: What do you say about massacre in Bucha? Yes, I understand that in the West the tragedy in Bucha is presented exclusively one-sidedly — as a crime by the Russian army. The same thing happens in the Ukrainian media. Russia was blamed immediately, even though there had been no investigation.

It was the same in 2014, when the Malaysian Boeing was shot down over Donetsk, and more recently in Kramatorsk, when Tochka U missiles were fired at the railway station. However, there was a mistake there — the wreckage of the missile was photographed by foreign journalists and shown in the media, and it turned out that it showed the same series of missiles that Ukraine has been shelling Donetsk with all these years. And the tragedy in Kramatorsk was immediately hushed up.

But Bucha continues to be promoted. The day after the news broke, Russia tries to convene the UN Security Council, but is rebuffed. Twice. Moreover, intelligence reports indicate that similar provocations are being prepared right now in other cities that the Russian army has left behind. But there are several irrefutable facts that prove that the Russians had nothing to do with the tragedy in Bucha.

Fact 1: White armbands.

If you’ve seen pictures of the corpses from Bucha, you’ve probably noticed that many of them have white bandages on their shoulders. Some of them had their hands tied with white armbands. White armbands are the identification sign of the Russian army. That is why civilians in Bucha also wore white armbands when the Russians were standing in this city — in this way they showed that they were their own.

Note — the clothes are clean. But if we believe that this man was killed by the Russian military — the corpse must have been lying on this spot for at least 3–4 days. It had been raining in Bucha all this time. The body looks fresh.

Note, next to some of the bodies there are Russian Army packs, which were issued by Russian soldiers to civilians. Now ask yourself the question: why was the departing army shooting civilians? What was the point?

Corpses in the basement. Apparently they were tortured and then just shot. Probably for cooperating with the Russian military.

If they were such beasts and occupiers as they are presented by the Ukrainian and Western press — they would have shot them in the first days after they entered the city. And they would have done the same to the people of Kherson and Melitopol, which are now under Russian rule. But no — there is a peaceful life there.

There was no reason for the Russians to kill civilians leaving the city. But the Ukrainian special services and national battalions, who entered Bucha after the Russian army left and saw people there with the identification signs of the enemy, could have done so. More on this below. If they were really as brutal as the Ukrainian and Western press portrayed them, they would have killed those people as soon as they entered the city.

Fact 2: The mayor’s statement.

The Russian army withdrew from Bucha on March 30. The next day, a video statement by Mayor Anatoly Fedoruk appeared on the Internet, in which he smiled cheerfully and congratulated the locals on Liberation Day from the Russian occupiers. He says: “This is a joyous day for us!” In this video, he did not say a word about the pile of corpses that should already be lying on the streets of the city. So they weren’t there yet.

Fact 3: Maxar satellite images.

After the first inconsistencies in the Ukrainian version began to emerge, satellite images of Bucha from Maxar were produced in the NYT investigation. They refer to the March 19 image, which allegedly shows bodies. But there is no image from March 19 on the Maxar website itself. Imagine for yourself what would have happened to bodies that had been lying on the street for two weeks. They obviously would not look as fresh as in the photo.

Fact 4: The mopping up of Bucha.

On April 2, the National Police of Ukraine, the Safari special-purpose regiment (a very meaningful name), entered the city and began a cleanup operation. Here is the video that was posted on their Facebook page on April 2.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7yIyNBMpQY

In 7 minutes of video — not a single body, but a lot of broken equipment (the Ukrainian army was shooting at positions occupied by Russia).

And here is direct evidence that the bodies were laid out by the Ukrainian military. This is a video from a Ukrainian channel — journalists were simply given the full video, and they did not even bother to check it and publish it in the media.

Some say that the Ukrainian military is demining the bodies this way. Seriously? At a distance of two meters and without any protection? So they knew that the bodies were definitely not mined.

At the same time, the Nazi Boatsman’s (Sergey Korotkih) squad also stopped by in Bucha. In a video he posted on his telegraph, his partner asks: “Is it possible to shoot at people who are not wearing blue armbands? (a distinctive sign of the Ukrainian army)” Botsman answers in the affirmative. Most likely, it was Botsman’s unit that was the perpetrator of this bloody provocation.

The Russian special services already have evidence that the provocation in Bucha was supervised by British MI6. The command from the British advisors went to the head of the Ukraine Security Service counterintelligence department, Oleksandr Poklad. Poklad forwarded the instruction to Botsman.

By organizing the provocation in Bucha, Poklad solved two tasks. The first task was the disposal of bodies. Shortly before the start of the military campaign, every region and city of Ukraine compiled lists for the elimination of undesirable persons in the event of a military clash with Russia. In Kiev, this list is especially extensive. Both counterintelligence officers and neo-Nazis were involved in the elimination of the undesirables.

Bodies were taken to the woods near Irpen, in order to later pass them off as victims of military action. When commanded by Poklad, Botsman collected the bodies and took them to Bucha, and arranged an allegedly old mass grave that was left behind by Russian troops. In addition, Botsman gave instructions to shoot civilians in Bucha to create a picture and leave the corpses along the road.

In order to organize everything, Bucha was closed for three days and a curfew was imposed there until April 5. But for some reason it ended already on April 4, as soon as the whole production was performed.

To prove that everything that was organized in Bucha was a bloody provocation, organized by neo-Nazis and the SBU counterintelligence department, is very simple. To do this, it is only necessary to identify all the persons found in the mass grave. Probably, for this purpose it will be necessary to take DNA tests of the deceased. People who disappeared en masse in Kiev, people who took a pro-Russian position, simply could not all end up in one grave in Bucha.

But, of course, no one will do this. Because then the whole Western world would be forced to admit that it covers up and justifies murderers and terrorists. But the truth would still come out. As it became known with the Colin Powell test tube and other American fakes.

--

--