The Power Struggle in Sudan: Al-Burhan vs. Al-Hemedti

Introduction

Sudan has been no stranger to political turbulence and power struggles in recent years. At the heart of these conflicts lies a notable rivalry between two prominent military leaders, General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and General Mohamed Hamdan “Hemedti” Dagalo. This article aims to shed light on the war of influence and interests between these two figures within Sudan’s complex political landscape.

Background

General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and General Mohamed Hamdan “Hemedti” Dagalo both emerged as prominent military leaders in Sudan during a pivotal period in the nation’s history. Their paths crossed as they navigated the transition from the authoritarian regime of President Omar al-Bashir to a more democratic Sudan.

General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan:

• Al-Burhan served as the head of Sudan’s transitional military council following President al-Bashir’s removal from power in April 2019.
• He is seen as a more moderate figure within the military establishment and has expressed a willingness to cooperate with civilian forces in Sudan.
• Al-Burhan’s leadership has been characterized by efforts to maintain a balance of power between the military and civilian components of the transitional government.

General Mohamed Hamdan “Hemedti” Dagalo:

• Hemedti is a prominent figure within the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), a paramilitary group formed during President al-Bashir’s regime.
• He has been associated with a more hardline stance and has faced allegations of human rights abuses, particularly in the Darfur region.
• Hemedti wields significant influence within the Sudanese military and has shown an inclination to protect his interests and those of his RSF.

The War of Influence

The war between al-Burhan and Hemedti can be characterized by their competing visions for Sudan’s future and their desire to protect their respective spheres of influence.

1. Civilian-Military Power Balance: Al-Burhan seeks to maintain a balance of power between the military and civilian components of the transitional government, allowing for a more inclusive and democratic transition. Hemedti, on the other hand, is perceived as favoring a stronger military role in governance, potentially undermining the civilian-led transition.
2. Resource Control: Sudan’s political instability is exacerbated by competition for control over economic resources. Both leaders have vested interests in securing access to these resources, particularly gold and oil, to further their ambitions and consolidate power.
3. Regional and International Dynamics: The rivalry between al-Burhan and Hemedti also plays out on the regional and international stage, with both leaders seeking external support and alliances to bolster their positions.

Prospects for Peace

The ongoing struggle for power between al-Burhan and Hemedti poses challenges to Sudan’s democratic transition. Achieving a stable and inclusive government will require:

1. Mediation and Diplomacy: International and regional actors, including the African Union and the United Nations, can play a crucial role in mediating between the conflicting parties and facilitating dialogue.
2. Accountability: Addressing human rights abuses and holding those responsible accountable will be essential to restoring trust and ensuring a peaceful transition.
3. Civic Engagement: Encouraging civic engagement and participation in Sudan’s political processes can help counterbalance military influence and promote democratic values.

Conclusion

The war of influence between General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and General Mohamed Hamdan “Hemedti” Dagalo underscores the complexities and challenges of Sudan’s transition to democracy. While their rivalry may create obstacles, it is ultimately the Sudanese people’s aspirations for freedom, justice, and democracy that will determine the nation’s future. International support and diplomatic efforts will be crucial in guiding Sudan towards a peaceful and democratic path forward.