Honestly, I’m a bit surprised by this post. NdT is largely revered in the science and geek community. This Wired piece is one of the few criticisms I’ve seen of him. So how does one negative article relate to the “twice as good” requirement (and yes people, it does exist. Just ask our President)? And as for Richard Dawkins, he gets plenty of criticism. Just google “Richard Dawkins” and the criticisms are right there on page one.