This story is unavailable.

Has anyone ever noticed that these articles seem to offer predictions as if they were evidence? From my point of view, “climate denial” rests with those who deny that the climate is in a constant state of flux. I have seen a lot of arguments for man made climate change but nearly every single one seem to focus on what’s going to happen. They all make an emotional appeal as well which is the number one issue I have with it. Either it’s science or it isn’t. Emotions shouldn’t matter if you have evidence to back your point.

Like what you read? Give Marcus Westcott a round of applause.

From a quick cheer to a standing ovation, clap to show how much you enjoyed this story.