Mark Beylin
Nov 3 · 1 min read

We implement this now simply as a signed message, which looks like an unintelligible hash to them. It would be cool if we could supply function name and params as well, and MM could verify that they match up to the hash, and show them plainly for users to see. I suspect this would also be useful for actual transactions as well (since even those still lack this type of granularity). Unfortunately I’ve never heard of a standard for this sort of thing, but I’d be delighted to help champion one if you’re interested.

    Mark Beylin

    Written by