Those are average costs — but birth control pills can cost a lot more than that, according to a…
Caroline O.
533

The costs of my wife’s birth control pills (I pick them up, so I pay): before ACA, $5 after ACA $5. Wow, what a great benefit. Oops, wait, $5 - $5 = 0 ;) Her OB-Gyn prescribes up to 6 months per visit, so visits aren’t that many and the copay is, under ACA, $10, and before ACA, it was $10. i.e. nothing has changed for us.

Before ACA we were able to use an out-of-state insurance provider, but after ACA my employer had to change to a slightly higher in-state insurance provider, in regards to premium price as well since state law requires at least 50% payment for my insurance, which means my employer has to pay a higher price. Then my employer changed insurance providers, yet again, and it was another in-state provider and went back down a bit. Net-net, no change. We have 4 choices in our state, so they have to compete. Ok, one does not allow you to keep your own doctor, so we didn’t chose that one, even though it is a bit lower per month, but per visit co-pays are significantly higher. Thus, the best plan for us is one that we can keep our doctors, and ends up being a bit better coverage per visit, so ok 3 choices.

What ACA did was wipe out the most cost effective one, the one that was out- of-state. The increased competition from out-of-state was good, now the in-state ones only have each other as competition and they could raise the premiums and increase co-pays. Out-of-state competition prevention is one big downside of the ACA. So, we could have had fiercer price competition. So, do I want the ACA repealed, you bet! At least the out-of-state portion (and the mandate portion) which limits freedom because it lowers competition. For me, the ACA has had negative effect from day 1, and 200 of my colleagues.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.