Hillary Clinton is not fit to serve as our next President

Hillary Clinton is angry. She has has slammed the FBI’s claims that she was “extremely careless” in handling classified material — which constitues treason, and is punishable by law — and claims that the comments are nonsense.

She has made great efforts to downplay the claims by FBI director James Comey that she was in any way negligent.

Uh, yeah. Right. Exposing national security information to vulnerability to interception is not wrong. Being careless is not wrong.

If I am careless, and my actions result in the death of a fellow human being, that’s manslaughter, and is punishable by law. How is this any different? Please, enlighten me.

I’m waiting.

The arrogance of this woman is breathtaking. The fact that she feels that she does not have to follow the rules that everyone else does, and to bear the consequences for her actions, is stunning.

Ignorance of the law doesn’t make you innocent, especially when you are a lawyer yourself. You know the law; you know what is right. If you break the law, you should bear the consequences of doing so. The rest of us have to.

Why shouldn’t she?

She broke the law. Carelessness, at best. Treason at worst. Both are punishable by law. Both bear consequences. But, apparently for her, it does not. The rules are different for her.

I do not accept that.

Edward Snowden is in exile for doing so for the right reasons, but she feels she is still a viable candidate to sit in the Oval Office as our next President when she does the same thing? He faces the potential of life in prison for doing the right thing in getting the information out to the world for all to see.

She feels that she did nothing wrong, that she should not be held accountable. That she is above the law.

I think not.

The question is, what do you think?