Sure, people’s salary changes and the GDP changes, that is irrelevant to the math of your example and is not an apt excuse for providing an unequal comparison.

Also your example of the CEO pay vs employee pay doesn’t make sense. A better comparison would be in BOTH companies you make $50K because that is what that job pays in the market, and is not connected to the CEO’s salary. Just look at salaries of top CEOs over the past 50 years compared to base employee salaries. Your example is not based in reality.

“What I suggest is that we optimize for growth along with competitive tax policies so that the total tax revenue increases and we can do more for our society.”

What does this mean? Give specifics. What is optimizing for growth? What is a competitive tax policy? How are these things better than actually improving the salaries of the lower/middle classes and raising taxes on the upper classes?