Thanks for sharing your opinion Per. First it’s Karl-Henrik Robèrt. Second as it is your opinion this piece doesn’t present sufficient facts — which means you are of course allowed to write sentences like “ The absence of any condemnation for violation of ethics” and others. If you think that your readers should be informed (and should be allowed to understand your opinion) you might want to add facts to your judgment — otherwise it remains what it is now: your opinion (or partly close to a pamphlet). Thanks again.