Design for Service Syllabus
Spring 2017, Carnegie Mellon School of Design
Professor: Molly Wright Steenson, PhD
TAs: Francis Carter & Silvia Mata-Marin
Service design is hard but rewarding work. It will give you a chance to flex all of your design muscles, the conceptual to the concrete, from thinking to making.
We all have an idea of what a good service is — when everything clicks into place, when you feel a little surprised and delighted because of the thoughtfulness and smoothness. And we know what it’s like when a service goes wrong — missed flight connections leading to sleeping on an airport floor, sitting for too long in a doctor’s waiting room, a website or app acting tone deaf in a sensitive situation. So what does it take to get a service right? And how can our services best communicate and reflect their interactions with us when they’re integrating different streams of data?
We will explore the fundamentals of service design in this lecture/studio class. In the first part of the class, we’ll begin with a set of modules on tools and practices of service design. Then, you’ll put them to use in a 9-week group project with a client, in which you design and prototype a service. Our goals (and the objectives of this class) will be to learn service design fundamentals by hypothesizing, experimenting, building, testing our assumptions, sometimes failing, tweaking, and improving. Some great visitors will join us too, in person and virtually, to provide real-world insights about service design.
In this class, you will:
- Understand the fundamental tools and practices of service design
- Learn and experiment with service design models
- Work on a group project to develop a service concept, scenarios, blueprint, maps, and prototypes that you test along the way
- Learn and practice fundamentals and basics of data analysis and visualization
- This Medium syllabus and the Course Policies. I will update this syllabus multiple times a week. You should visit it as you prepare for every class session.
- You must purchase or otherwise acquire one book: Service Design: From Insight to Implementation by Andy Polaine, Lavrans Løvlie, Ben Reason.
- Other readings on Box or elsewhere on the Internet, week by week (noted below)
- Are available in PDF on Box.
Schedule, Readings, and Assignment
Week 1, January 16: What is—and isn’t—service design? An introduction to service design
- Tuesday: Intro to service design and getting to know each other.
- Assignment, to complete before Thursday’s class: You must complete this assignment in time for Thursday’s class because we’re going to be using your observations for Thursdays service jam. Spend an hour in a busy cafe or restaurant, paying attention to the service experience. Go with a partner from class if you can. What roles do you see, and what roles might support those roles (onstage/backstage)? What don’t you see? Where do people interact with the service and through which touchpoints, physical, digital, informational, and otherwise? What little details do you notice — the service gestures? What infrastructures might be supporting these services (including ones you might not see)? You’ll want to spend some time doing what anthropologist Genevieve Bell has called “deep hanging out” — just hang out and pay attention. Acclimate yourself. Stay off text and email during this observation! After you’ve settled in, make notes in a notebook. Sketch things that you see. If you can take photos without being intrusive, do. When you are done, give yourself a few minutes to reflect on the experience, doing some free writing for yourself.
- Thursday: 100-minute service design jam. In one class period, we’ll move very quickly through the components of a service design project. (The Global Service Jam is usually a 48-hour sprint for designing new services and there will likely be one in Pittsburgh during the semester, if you’d like to take part.) We’re going to do an extremely condensed version. You will be using your observations from the assignment in this class.
Week 2, 1/23: Service design concepts
To read for class on 1/23. There are several links but they are very quick readings. I will call on students at random to provide a brief summary of each piece, so please be ready.
From Tuesday: There were lots of examples of the ways that services provide care, access or response—often all of the above, to use the framework by Polaine, Løvlie & Reason. But even better, here are some of the examples that your groups compiled.
- Polaine et al., chapter 2. [this time on Box, but please buy or secure your own copy].
- Meld Studio, “What service design IS, and what it IS NOT”
- Mark Stickdorn, UIE, “Service Design Thinking”
- Meghan Lazier, “What is Service Design?”
- Interaction Design Foundations, “The Principles of Service Design Thinking”
Week 3, 1/30: Value propositions, mapping and blueprinting
- Hugh Dubberly & Shelley Evenson, “Designing for Service: Creating an Experience Advantage,” (2010).
- Lucy Kimbell, The Service Innovation Handbook (Amsterdam: BIS Publishing, 2014), chapter 2. [Box]
We also began talking about the role of data in services, and this week and last, you’ve begun to think of flows of value exchange.
This article in Motherboard, “The Data That Turned the World Upside Down” shows how data and social media can affect major events like our recent presidential election. Previous articles in previous elections, like this one, “The Nerds Go Marching In” talk about how President Obama’s team hired folks from Twitter to run the data team—and the role it played in helping Obama win the election.
Week 4, 2/7: Introducing data visualization
- Molly is out this week at the IxDA Interaction 17 Conference in New York. You are responsible for working Tableau 10 Essential Training and submitting the assignments to Francis, Silvia and Molly. You have information in your email about getting Tableau installed: you will have a license till mid-May.
Week 5, 2/14: Touchpoints and servicescapes
- Mary Jo Bitner, “Servicescapes: The Impact of Physical Surroundings on Customers and Employees,” Journal of Marketing 56 (1992): 57–71. This article precedes the birth of the Web & commercial Internet, but is helpful in thinking through today’s digital and physical interactions.
- Richard Normann, “Reconfiguring the Value Landscape,” 2001. [Box]
Week 6, 2/21: Service dissection
Read: Alexander Osterwalder & Yves Pigneur, Business Model Generation. Introduction to the business model canvas and its building blocks
Tuesday: Dissecting a service and business models, in class.
Thursday: Possible in-class visit from service design employers visiting for Confluence. This session may crossover with other discussions, but it will be worth your while to meet them in a smaller, focused setting.
SERVICE DESIGN PROJECT: PROJECT BREATHE
Teams and groups:
- Team 1: Angel Yu, Elise Qian, Monica Looze, Jeong Min Seo
- Team 2: Raphael Weikart, Jeffrey Chou, Michelina Campanella, Clara Kim, Emily Saltz
- Team 3: Alex Wang, Manya Krishnaswamy, Mika Nomura, Denise Nguyen
- Team 4: Yining Zhao, Louise Zhou, Sarah-Marie Foley, Sriram Venkiteswaran, Tina Park
- Team 5: Danny Choo, Manjari Sahu, Eunice Oh, Minrui Li, Deborah Lee
- Team 6: Michelle Tai, Nurie Jeong, Chengcheng Zhao, Lauren Miller
- Team 7: Adena Lin, Caroline Hermans, Jesse Wilson, Xiaonan Chen, Adella Guo
- Team 8: Nehal Vora, Shunta Mcdavid, Emma Shi, Angee Attar
- Team 9: Delanie Ricketts, Scott Dombkowski, Ji Tae Kim, Dalia Dorantes
Developing Services with Data for Children with Asthma
Asthma is a chronic disease that affects the airways of the lungs. Nearly 25 million people in the US suffer from asthma—16% of all Americans, and 8.6% of children, according the CDC—or even 1 in 10 children, according to the AAAAI. It is a number that is growing, more so in children than adults and in multiple-race, African American, native American and Alaska natives, and in families below the poverty line (see this report). Asthma accounts for almost 2 million trips to the emergency room a year (AAFA.org)—it’s the #3 reason for children’s visits to the ER. It’s also a major reason for children to miss school days.
Medication can help to keep asthma under control for children (inhalers, oral medication, alternative medication). But it requires a family learning about the child’s triggers for asthma, such as allergies or other environmental factors. And once a treatment regimen is found, the child needs to actually follow through on medication. Ideally, the hope is for children to move toward self-management, as they start to move toward their preteen years (from age 4–10). This is a process in which the whole ecosystem around the child can participate—parents, teachers, coaches, doctors, pharmacists, camp counselors, and so on. Integrating and visualizing data sources that range from self-tracking data to environmental data available from the Environmental Protection Agency and the CDC will provide additional data and knowledge within the service.
About 10% of children in the US suffers from asthma, and the amount of kids with asthma is expected to grow until 2025 at least. Besides health issues and discomfort, asthma also causes a $56 billion in healthcare and productivity costs. For kids, the main challenges are to remember to take the medicine, to take it in the right way, and to understand the amount and types of activity they can engage in, without causing an asthma attack. For parents and doctors, it is important to understand how to best support the child in managing their asthma. It is therefore important that children, parents and medical professionals do not only get the right information, they also need to receive it in the right context, timing, and presentation, and maybe even other aspects play a role in this.
How can we support transition of children (4–10 years) from parental management to self-management in their asthma care.
We expect students to pick children of a specific age and phase in their condition, i.e. being recently diagnosed, veteran user, or post-event state. Students should consider all stakeholders and touch points, but focus in their design activity on creating one or two touch points that fit in their envisioned service flow. We are primarily interested in how, when and what data to present to the stakeholders in order to address the challenge. Students could consider the following, as a starting point:
- Type of asthma and length of treatment
- Geolocation impact; polluting industry nearby; smog; etc
- Genomic background
- Medication usage per age/area/cultural background; per state, per country
- Social issues and opportunities later in life; type of work, length of career, etc
- Population health (USA / Worldwide)
- Progress of disease and corresponding events
Questions to begin exploration and scope
- Which are the main stakeholders? At least consider child/parent/doctor. Which others are involved?
- Which stakeholder relationships will you focus on? Which are key to solve the main problems?
- What is the service flow across different stages of the patient/user journey?
- How can data collection/processing/visualization support the different touchpoints?
- Aside from user-data interaction, how could technology and data visualization support dialogue between stakeholders?
- How to present data and information in such a way that it leads to a change or maintenance of user behavior?
- How can a solution support the parent/child relationship and not hinder daily life?
- What is the primary concern of each key stakeholder? What are their goals?
- What are the main environments they interact in?
- What data/information is most important in different environments and at different moments? Why? How can the visualization support this?
Asthma sources (we will add to this list)
- American Lung Association on asthma
- American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI)
- Asthma & Allergy Foundation of America (AAFA)
- World Asthma Day: May 2, 2017
- CDC: faststats on asthma
Data sources (we will add to this list)
How your project will be evaluated
A few notes: while this looks like a lot of things to hit, just by doing your project week by week, you’ve already completed many of them.
- Your service has a unique name and a clear value proposition. Your team can state its mission, who the stakeholders are, and what value it provides.
- Your team documents your progress on the web, week by week.
- Your service takes data into account and incorporates it into the service. You’ve experimented with data and data visualization.
- You developed the service with secondary research and with some user research. You’ve done interviews or observations, and then you’ve done service experiments and tests of your prototypes with users.
- You demonstrate the flows, touchpoints, journeys, front/back stage, and lines of visibility in deliverables including: an evolving service blueprint (with post-its and digitally), with increasing levels of details; a journey map, value flow diagrams—and any other diagrams or deliverables that your team needs to develop to clarify your idea. For the final review, you will show a digital version of your blueprint.
- You designed and prototyped at least two touchpoints for the service. [UPDATE: THE DATA PIECE IS OPTIONAL. One of them should consider how it works with data (input, visualization, collection).] For the final review, you will show touchpoints in context in your video.
- For the final review: You develop a video of your service prototype (2–4 minutes) that demonstrates the experience of your service.
- For the final review: You develop and give a 3-minute pitch. This is separate from the video and will be given with a deck, in class, with each member of your team pitching. (You may then show your video afterwards).
- For the final review:You also deliver a 5-minute case study. This is different from the pitch, and tells the story of what you tried, what worked, what didn’t work, what you learned, and what you’d do differently. (This makes it so you don’t need to tell that story in your pitch or video.)
Week 7, 2/28:
- Project briefing with Jon Rodriguez, Philips (via Skype). Slides here: https://cmu.box.com/s/0oxndeos511182mc3zsscf4kz2a926x4
- Getting to know your team
- Starting secondary research, sharing with class, mapping the territory
Week 8, 3/6: Research & initial service ideas
Visit from client. Also required this week: all students must attend the lecture by Sarah Hendren on Monday, March 6.
- Continue secondary research, including on data sources
- Projects and precedents: read case studies and find existing services, interfaces, and projects
- Recruit for primary research
Resources on designing for children and design research with children
- Alison Druin, (2002) The role of children in the design of new technology, Behaviour & Information Technology, 21:1, 1–25, DOI: 10.1080/01449290110108659. [Box]. We’ll discuss some of her frameworks in class.
- “Research with children: methodological and ethical challenges,”
Jóhanna Einarsdóttir, European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, Vol. 15, No2, June 2007. [Box] This piece has useful guidance about setting expectations for interviews.
- Dr. Julie Kientz, a professor at the University of Washington, teaches an advanced class on Design Research & Children. Her syllabus and its materials are available online.
- “Approaches to User Research When Designing for Children” and “Do-Designing with Children” columns by by Catalina Naranjo-Bock
- Designing with Children Database: a variety of projects (many at the architectural scale) showing design with and for children
Precedent projects and
Week 9, 3/13: SPRING BREAK. NO CLASS.
Sometime before you’re back from spring break, listen to this podcast.
It’s from the VC firm a16z on Honor, a company that provides the service of home healthcare. The Head of Design for Honor is on the podcast. It’s relevant for our purposes here, even though the market segment is different.
Week 10, 3/20: Service propositions & scenarios
- Present initial service proposition & scenarios
- Primary and user research
Week 11, 3/27: Mapping & service experiments
Molly out for conference travel, 3/27:
Update: Work-in-progress presentations
Thanks for the nudge — I’d spoken to the classes last week but didn’t update the site yet.
This is a work in progress presentation. Each team will have 7 minutes to present, with a 2–3 minutes of feedback. Please mind the time, and please: everyone on your team should speak. Jess Wheedon from Philips will be there. Presentations do NOT need a PPT or Keynote deck: use key images, use your website.
Some things you will answer:
- What are/is your intended service proposition (or propositions) — what are you exploring?
- What is your primary/secondary research plan, and what are you learning?
- Are you at a point when you are working on a value flow diagram? If so, present it.
- What kinds of data will your service incorporate?
- What are the key questions that you have at this point? What are your
This week, you will also:
- Retool and finalize service proposition
- Develop scenarios
- Develop stakeholder maps, value flow diagrams, journey maps
Week 12, 4/3: Service experiments
NOTE: CHANGE IN PLAN. WE WILL BE TALKING ABOUT SERVICE BLUEPRINTING.
For 4/5, read: Practical Service Blueprinting Guide & Facilitator Guide by Erik Flowers & Megan Miller. [Box] This is a practical and useful tool that you can use as you chart out your service interactions. You may even wish to leaf through it in class—we will discuss on 4/3.
Miller and Flowers are tireless champions of a straightforward but effective approach to service design—see more at their Practical Service Design blog. For my lecture today, I referred to their post on how journey maps differ from service blueprints.
- Develop scenarios
- Plan & conduct first service experiments
- Start blueprinting
Note that you will work back and forth between all of these deliverables. Keep updating your work on your work-in-progress sites.
Additional resource on service blueprinting: The Adaptive Path Guide to Service Blueprinting is available for download. Especially useful: the discussion about current vs. future state blueprinting (p. 17 and onward), and on “levels of fidelity” and “levels of zoom” (p. 32 and onward).
Week 13, 4/10: Touchpoints and service prototypes
Read: Polaine, chapters 5–6: Update: please read this for reference and for use when you’re working in service blueprinting. You may find that the materials on Practical Service Blueprinting are more straightforward for your team to use. You should also refer to the Adaptive Path Guide as well. While these aren’t “required readings” in the sense that you might be tested on them, consider them to be highly recommended. They’re quick to page through and will provide you with very useful information.
Tuesday, 4/11: Turning the corner: on touchpoints and prototyping
- Provocations, experiments, touchpoints, and prototyping. Presentation and group time.
Thursday, 4/13: Data visualization [UPDATE: instead of a presentation in class, Molly will provide materials for you to review outside of class, to make for more time getting feedback on projects.]
- Presentation from Molly & group time.
Week 14, 4/17: Service prototypes redux
- 4/17: In class work
- 4/19: No class (Carnival)
Week 15, 4/24: Video prototyping
Your video should be 2–4 minutes and introduce your service. You don’t need to do live action—you might choose to do stop motion, or still photos with voiceover and music. Here are two finalists from this year’s IxDA Interaction Awards (disclosure: I’m the Awards co-chair). Please note that these are professional, not student productions—Heart Partner was done by FCB, and I include it because it is not live. The Collective Health project is by Susan Dybbs, a CMU School of Design alum.
Week 16, 5/1: Develop pitch and case study
In class on 4/25, I showed examples from the final review from the Aid Abroad group from the 2016 Design for Service class by Zai Aliyu, Yoon-Ji Kim, Tracy Potter, Courtney Pozzi, and Ming Xing: a pitch that included a concept prototype (delivered as a set of still photographs) and the case study.
It’s up to you how you order your pitch and video. You may wish to start your pitch, show your video, conclude your pitch, then show your case study, or you may choose to pitch fully and then show the video, and then do the case study (or some other permutation). You all must speak in your presentation. Practice: timing is strict so that we can make sure you have time for feedback. Each team will have 20 minutes, of which 10–12 minutes will be spent on the presentation.
Rather than the week-by-week project blog you’ve been keeping, the case study an after-the-fact story of your project. It will include the work you’ve done on your project (service proposition, blueprints/maps/diagrams, scenarios, photos from research, sketches, touchpoint prototypes), but it will tell a story. All of you have had twists and turns along the way, and this is an opportunity share what you’ve learned. Think of this as a piece you might include in (or link to from) your portfolio. It doesn’t have a minimum length but it needs to be long enough to share the highlights of your project.
Here are some prompts to get your group’s case study started. In the case of Aid Abroad, the team followed them almost exactly. You don’t have to, but they’re here to get you thinking about your project.
- First, we…
- We tried…
- We learned…
- We did…
- But then…
- And so we…
- We discovered…
- We were surprised by…
- ___ was surprisingly easy. We…
- …. but ____ was difficult.
- Our hunches about ____ were correct, and our hunches about ____ were wrong.
- Finally, we…
- If we had to do it over again…