TREE(3) is a big number, I mean really big.
Josh Kerr
61

Josh, you’ve probably gotten used to TREE(3) by now, so here’s a truly large number: SSCG(3). See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedman%E2%80%99s_SSCG_function

As it says in the article, SSCG(3) is not only larger than TREE(3), it is much, much larger than TREE(TREE(…TREE(3)…)) where the total nesting depth of the formula is TREE(3) levels of the TREE function. That’s big.

Show your support

Clapping shows how much you appreciated Michael Tiemann’s story.