//Echelon Tokenomics Suggestion

metaregular
2 min readJan 28, 2022

--

I don’t believe there is anything wrong with the tokenomics as is. However, these are the tweaks I would make after hearing community thoughts. Full disclosure: I own Primary, Primesets, Cornerstones and loose cards, so i’m not looking to favor any collector type.

Here is what it currently looks like:

Adjustments:
• Reduce P2E emissions by 4.5% (this percentage can be tweaked) to 25.5%.
• Require the community to collectively reconstitute at least 4.5% of PRIME back to the P2E pool via lock ups (6months to a year) in order to earn PRIME for PRIME staking.

What this does:
• PRIME Stakers play a role in securing a portion of the pool in order to earn reward.
• Frees up 4.5% of the token pool to be re-allocated.

Where does the 4.5% go?:
• Increase 0.75% to Primeset Claim to 3%.
• Increase 1.75% Cardholder Claim to 6%
• 2% to Cornerstone NFTs Claim (Cores, Drives, Masterpieces)

What does the graph look like now:

Conclusion:
The numbers can be adjusted but the main premise is that by requiring lockups, it can free up allocation from P2E to shore up other areas. This needs to be modeled as I don’t know what I'm doing. Main risk is whether the 25.5% P2E pool is enough for the system to run in the chance that the community cannot lock up 4.5% for the remainder of the P2E pool to get it to the original proposed 30%.

--

--