One of the lenses I use when doing a design audit is to get a feel for the visitor inertia of a page or process. The gist is, in order for a visitor to your site to achieve a goal, you have to give them enough inertia in the sales process. It sounds simple enough, but many so-called best practices encourage the visitor to skip the sales process and go directly to the ask. Below I will diagram many of these cases, but first, let’s get a handle on this visualization.
- Sales: This is the sales copy, images, or anything else on the page that you are using to persuade the visitor. It can be lengthy or straight to the point.
- Ask: This is ultimately what you are asking the visitor to do on this visit. It might be entering their email, filling a form, liking a page, or buying something.
- Call to action: This is the “buy now” or “click here” button that takes you to the ask. Sometimes it’s not needed when the ask is on the same page as the sales.
- Visitor: This is the visitor to your site. They start at the top when they land on your site, and hopefully make their way over the ask hurdle.
- Level of persuasion: This is how persuasive your sales page actually is, not what you think it is. A higher and steeper sales page might include some powerful social proof or other sales devices.
- Level of resistance: The height here refers to how hard of an ask you have. A simple email address would be a shallow ask, and entering in your credit card might be a steeper ask. A lengthy form would be a long ask.
- Length of time: This is how long your sales and ask process takes.
The goal of any website with an ask, is to get that blue ball to build enough momentum to get up and over the ask. It sounds obvious but many sites cut their sales process short buy putting the call to actions above the fold and encouraging the visitor to click the “get started” or “download” button as soon as possible. In many cases that would look like this.
Clearly this is an ineffective model. You haven’t given the visitor enough inertia to power through the ask. You may have lots of great sales devices like testimonials and videos, but you are also encouraging the user to skip all that with a big and above-the-fold call to action.
In some cases, the call to action should be front and center. This is often because you don’t need an internal sales process as visitors already have inertia from branding and external momentum. Such is the case with the FireFox site. Mozilla doesn’t have to sell the benefits of FireFox. The visitor has likely already made up their mind to download it before they got there. You will note in this chart, the ask is relatively small. It’s just a one-click download. You don’t need much of a sales process to get them to take that action. Using the product is another process entirely though.
If you have a significant ask, like the visitor entering in their credit card number, you need to have a significant sales process and often keep the call to action away from the visitor until enough momentum is achieved. Sometimes the resistance level of the ask isn’t high, but the time requirement is. This might be asking the visitor to take a survey.
Sure it’s easy to tick some boxes, but you still need enough sales inertia to get them through it. In this example (left),
it is not clear if there is enough inertia at work. You would either need to reduce the length of the survey, or increase the length or persuasion of the sales process.
While lengthening the sales process can be effective to build inertia it can be taken too far. This is often the case with the bullshit internet marketing schemes. In this case, the ask is a significant “add to cart” of $700+. So they try to stuff every possible sales technique into the process resulting in a 30 minute sale if one were to read everything on the page. This simply won’t work because reading the sales copy is a time-ask itself. A long and unpersuasive sales process will just cause visitors to leave or skip down to the ask ‘unsold’.
The more savvy internet marketers will use a long sales process followed by a low ask, just your email. Then there is another sales process and another ask. Finally a persuasive, often on-the-phone sales process, followed by a large ask for… all your money.
There is an excellent article from Verge about the process. But scam artists aside, this process can be used for relative good. If you are selling a $1,000 product B2B, it’s going to be near impossible to build a long and persuasive enough sales process to get them over that first ask on the first visit. So you get their email first, then ask to show a demo, then a follow-up call. The smallest ask is simply the request to sell a little more with a “find out more” button. This can be done to lengthen the sales process while keeping the visitor engaged.
Beware the free trial
One mistake I often see is assuming visitors think the free trial is a low ask. RJ Metrics has a short sales page and prominent call to actions. This takes you to a sign up page where the plans start at $500, but “don’t worry, because it’s free for 30 days.” Visitors, especially corporate decision makers can be quite savvy and know that engaging in a free trial can mean a significant commitment to a product. The financial cost might be nil, but the time cost and more importantly the ego cost will be significant if the product doesn’t work out and I just wasted my employees time. So even if your trial is free, make sure you are building enough inertia to power through the perceived ask as well as the immediate one. You may be tempted to grab the email as fast as you can, but having a glut of unsold emails in your funnel will tax your own resources and dilute your message as you then have to address the sold and unsold in the same followup communications.
While it may be tempting to build a masterful sales process that rockets the user past the ask, you should really build no more than you need. If your site is for an iphone app, then the ask is pretty simple, get to the app store and download the app. App users are skilled at downloading and testing apps very quickly. The real sales process will be in the performance of the app, not in the sales page.
So any unnecessary length in the sales process will increase the chance of the visitor leaving. Even the most persuasive sales process is no match from a distracting text or an interrupting co-worker. So if the ask is short and sweet, keep the sell that way too.
So take a second look at your landing page. Are you encourage the user to go straight to the ask? Can you really provide enough inertia in 10 seconds? Or should you hold off on that call to action? Maybe you are overpowering the sales process, creating too much cognitive load for what would be a simple and straight forward ask. How many more conversions would you have if your visitors had the right amount of inertia? You would be surprised at the quality of conversions when you encourage your visitors to get below the fold.