“ Please, Michael James, become cognizance of the FACT that you do not dictate what I choose to write regarding your meaningless utterances.”
Too bad I’ve never dictated what you choose to write, I also don’t have to only discuss your obsession, or agree with your ignorance of the USDA or your lies about what I write. If you think pointing out your ignorance and lies is “dictating” what you choose to write because of your obsession and obvious sense of entitlement then that’s your issue and problem, not mine. Deal with it.
“ It is a shame, besides believing that somehow CO₂, the trace gas that is absolutely essential for all life on earth, is what kills people in closed areas where combustion takes place & not the deadly gas, CO, that Michael Jamesis so in the dark about the Department of Agriculture and who President Trump appoints to fill undersecretary positions and what their qualifications are. We must look back on many of Barack Hussein Obama’s appointments, such as the appointing the idiot John Holdren.”
You claim I am in the dark about USDA, and offer nothing but your own idiotic opinions. I offered information from the USDA, specifically the Departments in question, as well as the Legislation that governs it with citation and links.
- The information about the USDA Research Education and Economics and its Undersecretary is from their own department information. Which you were provided a link to in my last reply.
- The information about SNAP and Undersecretary of Agriculture for Food, Nutrition, and Consumer Services. is from their own department. Which again you were provided a link to my last reply.
- The information about the requirements of the USDA Undersecretary for Research, Education, and Economics are listed in the 2008 Farm Bill H.R. 6124 which you were also provided a link to in my last reply.
What the qualifications and responsibilities are all listed in those. Since you “choose” to claim I am in the “dark about the Department of Agriculture” then you get to PROVE with supporting citations/links that
- the USDA Department of Research, Education, and Economic is lying about it’s Duties, Areas of Responsibilities for itself and the Undersecretary over it who is also the Chief Scientist,
- that the USDA Department of Food, Nutrition and Consumer Services and it’s Undersecretary are lying and they are not over SNAP as they are mandated and actually do,
- and finally that the 2008 Farm Bill H.R. 6124 which created the USDA Department of Research, Education and Economics as well as the requirements for that Department's Undersecretary have been repealed or Altered.
If you cannot prove those, which we both know you can’t cause it is all current, valid and true, and from their own websites then you’re nothing more than a liar and fraud, who is also very ignorant of the USDA and it proves beyond contestation that I am correct and have been truthful, unlike you.
John Holdren was not the USDA Undersecretary of Research, Education and Economics, in FACT he was never appointed to the USDA at any point. This proves NOTHING concerning the current Topic, which is the Undersecretary of Research, Education and Economics and Qualifications required. That ain't dicating anything, that’s just pointing out how ignorant you really are, and that you don’t even know WHAT the Undersecretary of Research, Education and Economics actually is or does.
Your obsession with climate change has nothing to do with the Undersecretary of Research, Education and Economics and the requirements of their position. You “chose” to post on it in a lengthy diversionary way, I ain’t obligated to feed your obsession, or to follow your demand that I change topics just cause you want to.
“ Have nice day Michael James , while figuring out some other irrelevant bunch of nonsense to send my way.”
Ironic, given you chose to write a a reply to me that was nothing but a whole lot of irrelevant nonsense that had nothing to do with the Undersecretary of Research, Education and Economics.
Last chance, you can either prove your claims to 1,2 &3, or you can dodge and avoid again proving your nothing but an ignorant lying POS. Your choice, and that ain’t dictating how you respond or what you choose to write as you lied about and tried to claim, I am just stating my response, and what you have already proven with your replies. It ain’t my problem that it hurt your feelings or disrupted your obsession. Have a great day.
