mike llewellyn:
umair haque
43

Well, after you explain to the Medium community why you choose to interpret the comments of Richard Dawkins as “shaming a fourteen year old child for a science project”, when that is obviously a very biased summary of the events as anyone who paid any attention to it would know.

Or perhaps you’re an example of exactly the same kind of fool of faith falling into a misplaced tribal allegiance as you at some length describe?

I think you should analyse your own bias and try to reduce it because it would help get your points across — points with which I whole-heartedly agree with btw, as I’m sure would Richard Dawkins.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.