Miriam O'BrienNov 16, 2015
As I said, the deficiency you demonstrate in epistemology is tragically wanting.
JeanPaulZodeaux
1
Sheesh JeanPaul — read what I wrote again. Do I need to repeat it? Of course Einstein and Bohr weren’t debating the existence of the atom or phlogiston theory. (Did you miss the link in my comment?)
That’s my point.
The denier arguments that Walter B Paul refers to as “sides”, are what’s akin to a debate about the existence of the atom or the phlogiston theory of combustion. Or better yet, whether quantum physics is a hoax.
Now do you understand?
If not, take your time. Read this comment and my last again, and again. However long it takes you. With any luck it will sink in eventually.