Economic Impacts of Increasingly Frequent Climate Change-Induced Disasters

Part 1 of A Data-Driven Exploration

Photo by Matheo JBT on Unsplash

As the world grapples with the escalating consequences of climate change, the frequency and intensity of natural disasters are on the rise.

These events have profound economic ramifications that extend far beyond their immediate aftermath. To navigate this complex landscape, we embark on an exploratory analysis, the first step in our data science project, aiming to understand the intricate relationship between disaster characteristics and their economic impacts.

Drawing from relevant research, including studies by Mendelsohn et al. (2012), Raddatz (2009), Kousky (2014), and Cavallo & Noy (2010), this literature review lays the groundwork for our project, Understanding the Influence of Disaster Magnitude, Scale, and Frequency on GDP Growth. These sources, selected for their depth and significance, offer a mix of data, theories, and methods that will inform our data-driven exploration.

Our project’s objective is clear: To analyze how the magnitude, scale, and frequency of disasters influence a country’s adjusted reconstruction costs, using GDP per capita as a measurement.

By delving into predictor variables like disaster magnitude and frequency, and juxtaposing them against the dependent variable of GDP growth, we aim to uncover patterns, correlations, and insights that can inform policy, disaster response, and future research.

This literature review will cover eight key areas:

1. Magnitude and Reach: Defining disasters and understanding their economic implications.
2. Frequency of Disasters: The recurrence of these events and their economic ripple effects.
3. Economic Damages: The direct and hidden costs of disasters.
4. Analytical Approaches: Tools and methodologies in disaster economics research.
5. Data Challenges: The intricacies of ensuring data consistency and accuracy.
6. Forward-Looking Insights: Implications for our project
7. Concluding Reflections: Synthesizing our findings to offer a clear, holistic view of the landscape.

By the end of this review, my goal is to offer a comprehensive backdrop for our subsequent data-driven analysis, ensuring our project is rooted in both academic depth and real-world applicability. The overarching aim is to synthesize the mass of research that probes the intersection between natural disasters and their economic aftermath. Through this exploration, I aim to spotlight patterns, correlations, and drivers that can inform resilient economic strategies and disaster preparedness in an ever-changing climate scenario. Let’s get right into it.

1. Disaster Magnitude and Scale

(1a) Definition and Measurement:

The magnitude and scale of a disaster are key to understanding its potential economic impact. However, the definition and measurement of these parameters can vary based on the type of disaster and the context of the study.

• Seismological Events: Earthquakes are measured using the Richter scale, which captures the energy they release. A study by Doocy et al. (2013) showed that each unit increase on this scale indicates a tenfold increase in seismic wave amplitude.
• Meteorological Events: Events like hurricanes and typhoons are categorized by their wind speeds, measured in kilometers per hour (kph). The Saffir-Simpson scale, for example, classifies hurricanes based on these speeds, with Category 5 being the most intense (Emanuel, 2011).
• Thermal Events: Extreme temperature events, such as heatwaves, are quantified by temperature deviations in degrees Celsius (°C). These deviations can affect ecosystems, agriculture, and health.
• Spatial Extent: The area affected by disasters like floods or wildfires is often measured in square kilometres (km²). Kousky (2014) highlighted that the size of the affected area directly relates to economic and environmental impacts.

In essence, understanding the magnitude and scale of natural disasters is crucial for assessing their broader societal and economic consequences.

(1b) Overview of impact on GDP

The economic repercussions of natural disasters, shaped by their magnitude and scale, have been thoroughly explored. Hallegatte et al. (2017) observed that while high-magnitude disasters undeniably lead to immediate economic setbacks, the broader economic landscape is shaped by a myriad of intertwined factors, both immediate and latent.

Methodological Evolution: Traditional disaster economic assessments primarily focus on tangible damages. However, as we’ll explore in the “Analytical Approaches” and “Data Challenges” sections, contemporary methodologies, as highlighted by Hallegatte et al. (2017), have broadened their scope. They now capture not only the direct damages but also the subtleties of indirect costs, such as disruptions in global supply chains and the potential socio-psychological impacts of disasters.

Short-Term vs. Long-Term Impacts: The immediate aftermath of a disaster is tangibly devastating, but the long-term economic trajectories are multifaceted. As we’ll delve deeper in the “Economic Damages and Reconstruction Costs” section, regions might experience a “reconstruction boom,” a paradoxical economic boost. However, this isn’t universal prosperity. Sectors such as tourism and agriculture may experience extended declines, particularly if the region’s image suffers damage.

Emerging Challenges in Temperate Regions: Our exploration in the “Magnitude and Reach” section will touch on the shifting disaster landscape in temperate regions. Historically less exposed to extreme weather events, these regions are now confronting unfamiliar challenges, magnified by a lack of preparedness and institutional memory. This often leads to economic damages disproportionate to the disaster’s scale.

Interdisciplinary Insights: The aftermath of a disaster is shaped by a variety of factors, from the immediate intensity of the event to the socio-economic fabric of the affected region. As we’ll discuss in the sections on “External Influences” and “Forward-Looking Insights,” regions with robust community networks might exhibit resilience, while areas with fragmented urban planning face amplified challenges.

In short, while the disaster’s intensity sets the initial conditions, the eventual economic trajectory is shaped by a complex interplay of socioeconomic, political, and psychological factors.

2. Frequency of Disasters

(2a) Trends in the frequency of disasters:

Historically, when we thought about natural disasters, certain regions came to mind: tropical areas with their cyclones and monsoons, or temperate zones with their snowstorms and occasional heatwaves. Let’s dive into these shifts, drawing from the latest studies, and explore their multifaceted implications.

Historical Context: Tropical regions, with their warm ocean waters and specific atmospheric conditions, have long been the hotspots for cyclones and related disasters. Meanwhile, temperate areas had their own set of weather challenges, mostly revolving around cold fronts and snow.

Emerging Trends in Temperate Regions: The paper on “Evidence for sharp increase in the economic damages of extreme natural disasters” highlighted a concerning trend. Temperate regions, which historically faced fewer extreme weather events compared to tropical counterparts, are now witnessing an uptick in such incidents. This is not just limited to increased temperatures or heatwaves but extends to cyclonic activities and heavy rainfall events. The lack of historical precedence means these regions often lack the infrastructure, policies, and preparedness to deal with such events, leading to disproportionately high economic and human costs.

Continued Vulnerability of Tropical Regions: While temperate regions are grappling with new challenges, tropical regions continue to bear the brunt of extreme weather events. As explored in several papers, the nature of these events is changing. For instance, while tropical regions have always faced cyclones, the intensity and frequency of these cyclones are on the rise. Furthermore, the compounding effect of other factors, such as deforestation and urbanization, exacerbates flood risks during heavy rainfall.

Interplay of Climate Change: A common thread across multiple studies is the role of climate change in these shifting patterns. Rising global temperatures, melting polar ice, and changing atmospheric dynamics are contributing to these shifts. For temperate regions, the melting polar ice is leading to changes in ocean currents and atmospheric patterns, contributing to unexpected weather anomalies. For tropical regions, warmer ocean waters are intensifying cyclonic activities.

Societal and Policy Implications: Beyond the immediate economic costs, these shifting patterns have broader societal implications. Regions unaccustomed to frequent disasters might face challenges in disaster management, policy formulation, and community preparedness. Conversely, regions with historical experience might need to recalibrate their strategies to deal with the increasing intensity of familiar disasters.

It’s evident that the geographical patterns of natural disasters are changing, presenting new challenges and necessitating a re-evaluation of strategies and policies. As we continue this review, understanding these nuanced shifts is crucial for effective disaster management and mitigation in the face of a changing climate landscape.

(2b) Economic implications of disaster frequency:

i. Economic Resilience and Disaster Frequency:

• Immediate Impact vs. Long-Term Erosion: Hallegatte & Dumas (2009) explored the contrasting economic impacts of single, high-magnitude disasters, like the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, versus a series of smaller but regular events, such as yearly floods. While the former can cause immediate economic shocks, the latter, over time, can subtly weaken an economy by straining resources, disrupting trade, and making the region less attractive for investments.
• Changing Dynamics in Temperate and Tropical Zones: Research indicates that temperate areas, which historically faced fewer extreme weather events, are now experiencing more of them. These regions, despite having strong economies, can face economic challenges due to their unfamiliarity with such events. On the other hand, tropical areas, accustomed to frequent disasters, have built certain resilience strategies. However, the intensifying effects of climate change are pushing these strategies to their limits.

ii. Impact on Key Sectors:

• Agriculture at Risk: Kellenberg & Mobarak (2008) emphasized the vulnerability of economies reliant on agriculture. Continuous disasters, particularly droughts, can lead to failed crops, skyrocketing food prices, and even severe food shortages, pushing regions into economic downturns.
• Tourism’s Delicate Balance: The study also shed light on the fragility of the tourism sector in naturally beautiful tropical regions. Regular occurrences of cyclones or floods, or even the mere perception of a region as disaster-prone, can deter tourists, causing substantial economic setbacks. This might push regions to diversify their economic base or invest more in disaster prevention to retain their appeal.

iii. The Cycle of Debt:

• The Need to Borrow: Hochrainer-Stigler et al. (2018) examined the financial challenges of countries frequently hit by disasters. They identified a pattern where nations, especially those with limited financial buffers, often resort to borrowing for reconstruction.
• Reliance on Aid: This continuous borrowing, particularly from global financial bodies, can lead to mounting external debt. Over time, this can erode a nation’s economic independence, making them increasingly reliant on international aid and the terms set by these institutions.

iv. Shifting Populations:

• Migration as a Double-Edged Sword: Gray & Mueller (2012) delved into post-disaster migration patterns. Their research indicates that while migration can initially provide economic relief by balancing labour markets in unaffected areas, the trend can reverse over extended periods.
• Imbalance in Labor Markets: Continuous disasters can drive sustained migration, leading to labour shortages in the affected regions. This can ripple through the economy, from rising labour costs to decreased productivity, further impacting the region’s economic growth.

To summarize, the economic fallout from disaster frequency is complex and interwoven. A comprehensive grasp, rooted in rigorous research and current trends, is vital for shaping informed policies and proactive disaster response strategies.

3. Economic Damages and Reconstruction Costs

(3a) General trends

Time’s Role and Regional Differences: A study by Visser et al. (2014) spanning several decades and regions unveiled significant shifts in economic damages over time. They found that temperate regions, though they might face rare but intense economic shocks from infrequent large-scale events, contrast sharply with tropical areas. The latter, familiar with regular but less severe events, often deal with a steady economic drain. This means temperate areas might be caught off-guard with sudden, massive reconstruction bills, while tropical regions constantly face the economic challenge of repeated rebuilding.

The Intricacies of Disaster Impact: Mendelsohn et al. (2012) took a deep dive into how disaster size relates to the resulting economic fallout. Their data-driven approach showed that the economic impact doesn’t always grow in a straightforward manner with the size of the disaster. For example, a Category 1 hurricane might cause damages limited to the coastlines. In contrast, a Category 5 storm, with its far-reaching effects, can disrupt entire economies, from supply chains to vital infrastructure, leading to costs that skyrocket beyond what you’d expect just by looking at the storm’s size.

The Hidden Costs Beneath the Surface: Kahn (2005) shone a light on the less visible, indirect costs of natural disasters. Beyond the immediate damages we can see, like ruined buildings or roads, there’s a domino effect on the economy.

Take a flood that damages a factory: the immediate repair costs are just the tip of the iceberg. The extended shutdown affects workers’ incomes, disrupts the flow of goods, and can even ripple out to areas far from the flood due to how economies are intertwined. Plus, the long-term health impacts, both mental and physical, add to healthcare expenses and can dampen overall productivity.

Varied Impacts Across Economies: It’s essential to recognize how disasters affect developed and developing economies differently. While developed countries, with their strong infrastructure and insurance safety nets, might bounce back faster in terms of immediate repairs, they aren’t immune to the sizable indirect costs, like business disruptions and lost productivity.

Meanwhile, developing countries, besides grappling with immediate damages, face long-term hurdles like dwindling foreign investments, growing debts, and even a potential exodus of talent as people move seeking better prospects after repeated disasters.

To sum it up, when we talk about the economic toll of natural disasters, it’s not just about the immediate damages we see. It’s a layered issue, with factors like time, disaster size, hidden costs, and the type of economy all playing a part.

(3b) Adjusted Reconstruction Costs

The Significance of Inflation Adjustments: In their extensive study on disaster impact assessments, Cavallo & Noy (2010) emphasized the pivotal role of inflation adjustments. Their research revealed that nominal reconstruction costs can often be misleading. For example, a reconstruction expenditure of $1 million in the 1980s had a vastly different economic implication than the same amount in the 2020s. By incorporating inflation adjustments, we can get a more accurate representation of the economic burden of disasters across various timeframes. This methodology captures the evolving value of currency and ensures that our interpretations remain both temporally consistent and relevant.

Regional Price Variations and Their Implications: Hallegatte et al. (2017) conducted an in-depth analysis of how regional price disparities influence disaster reconstruction costs. Their findings underscored that the purchasing power of a dollar varies considerably across regions.

For instance, a $1 million allocation in a developed nation like the USA might facilitate the rebuilding of a limited number of structures. In contrast, the same amount in a country like Bangladesh could potentially support a broader reconstruction initiative, given the relative affordability of labor and materials.

Recognizing and adjusting for these regional price differences is key. It provides a nuanced perspective on reconstruction needs and aids in the strategic allocation of international aid, ensuring resources are directed where they yield maximum impact.

Challenges in Cost Adjustments: The task of adjusting reconstruction costs, while essential, presents its own set of challenges. Obtaining reliable inflation data can be challenging, particularly for regions experiencing economic fluctuations. Moreover, regional price disparities are subject to change, influenced by a myriad of factors ranging from geopolitical shifts to market dynamics. It’s imperative for researchers and policymakers to exercise diligence, ensuring that their data sources for adjustments are both contemporary and trustworthy.

Adjusting reconstruction costs isn’t simply formulaic. To genuinely comprehend the economic repercussions of disasters, a systematic approach is required — one that is anchored in precise data and a thorough understanding of global economic intricacies.

(3c) Disaster Characteristics and Economic Impacts

Magnitude versus Costs: Beyond the Obvious: While it might seem intuitive to link higher magnitude disasters with increased costs, Kellenberg & Mobarak (2008) present a more nuanced perspective. Their extensive research, encompassing various disaster types and regions, indicates that other factors, such as preparedness, can significantly influence this relationship. For example, a region equipped with advanced early warning systems, resilient infrastructure, and informed communities might experience reduced economic damages from a high-magnitude event compared to a region lacking these safeguards.

Frequency versus Intensity: Raddatz (2009) offers a compelling exploration into the economic implications of disaster frequency as opposed to their intensity. His findings suggest that regions consistently affected by moderate disasters might face escalating economic burdens over time. This cumulative effect can, in some cases, eclipse the economic damages from singular, high-intensity events in other areas. The repeated onslaught of disasters can strain recovery efforts, exhaust resources, and hinder economic rejuvenation.

The Economic Significance of Spatial Dynamics: Kousky’s (2014) research provides valuable insights into how the location of a disaster can influence its economic consequences. A disaster impacting a major economic hub, such as a bustling port city, can have far-reaching economic implications, disrupting trade and supply chains. Conversely, a similar event in a less economically active area might have a reduced financial impact, even if the environmental consequences are severe.

The Role of Socio-Economic Context: Beyond the immediate characteristics of the disaster, the socio-economic environment of the affected area plays a crucial role in shaping economic outcomes. Aspects like insurance coverage, government fiscal policies, and community support structures can either amplify or mitigate economic damages. For instance, regions with robust insurance mechanisms might see quicker economic recoveries, while areas with strong community networks can benefit from collective rebuilding efforts.

4. The variables:

The following are the variables we will be exploring in the data analysis

• Temporal Dynamics (Year): The year of a disaster’s occurrence isn’t merely a timestamp. It encapsulates the socio-economic and infrastructural contexts of that period. As highlighted by Hallegatte et al. (2017), the economic impact of a disaster is intertwined with the prevailing global and regional economic conditions. I.e., a disaster during an economic downturn might have magnified repercussions due to constrained resources and limited external support. Conversely, during economic prosperity, recovery mechanisms might be more robust and swift.
• Geographical Context (Country): The location of a disaster is a combination of various determinants that collectively influence its economic aftermath. Factors such as GDP, governance structures, and infrastructure play pivotal roles. Additionally, the climatic context, whether temperate or tropical, adds layers of complexity. While tropical regions, accustomed to frequent disturbances, might possess certain resilience mechanisms, the recurring nature of these events can hinder complete recovery. On the other hand, temperate regions, though historically less affected, might grapple with heightened damages when disasters strike, given their relative unfamiliarity and potential lack of preparedness.
• Disaster Magnitude and Scale: While magnitude and scale offer quantitative insights into a disaster’s intensity, their economic ramifications are influenced by additional factors such as a region’s historical experiences with disasters, preparedness measures, and response strategies. For instance, a region equipped with advanced infrastructure might weather a high-magnitude event with relatively lesser economic strain than a less-prepared region facing a moderate event.
• Humanitarian Impact (Number of Deaths, Total Affected): The human toll of a disaster extends beyond the immediate loss of life. As articulated by Smith & Katz (2013), significant casualties can have ripple effects on labour markets and key economic sectors. A large affected population might strain essential services, leading to increased public expenditures and potential long-term economic challenges, especially if a significant portion of the workforce is impacted.
• Economic Metrics (Costs): Direct economic indicators, such as reconstruction costs, provide an immediate measure of a disaster’s financial impact. However, a broader perspective is essential. Kousky (2014) emphasizes the importance of indirect costs, which can range from business disruptions to long-term health implications. These costs, both direct and indirect, can have cascading effects across an economy, impacting sectors even distantly related to the disaster’s epicentre.

5. Challenges and Considerations:

(5a) Data Challenges

Variability in Measurement Standards: Disaster data isn’t one-size-fits-all. While some metrics, like the Richter scale for earthquakes, are universally consistent, others can vary by region. With cyclones, for example, how they’re measured might differ between the Atlantic and the Pacific, influenced by historical patterns and regional meteorological practices. Doocy et al. (2013) emphasized that such inconsistencies can complicate global analyses and cross-regional comparisons. Especially if it means basing policy decisions on data that’s not quite standardized.

Temporal Changes in Data Collection: Modern technology, from satellite imaging to drones, has transformed how we collect disaster data. But while we can now detail a flood’s impact or trace a forest fire’s path with precision, older events might not have such detailed records. Kousky (2014) pointed out that this disparity can skew long-term trend analyses. It’s like comparing a hand-drawn map to a satellite image; both show the route, but one is undoubtedly clearer.

Subjectivity in Reporting: Quantifying a disaster’s economic impact isn’t always straightforward. As Cavallo & Noy (2010) explored, the figures can be influenced by everything from political pressures to insurance assessments. This means the data might not always reflect the true extent of the damages. Achieving objective and consistent data collection is a challenge, but it’s essential for accurate disaster economics research.

(5b) External Factors:

Geopolitical Issues: Politics and international relations can also play a significant role in a country’s economic recovery post-disaster. A country under international sanctions, for example, might struggle to source reconstruction materials, driving up costs (Hochrainer-Stigler et al., 2018).

Material and Labor Costs: Post-disaster, the demand for raw materials and labour can surge, leading to price increases. Factors like migration can also affect labour availability and, in turn, reconstruction costs (Gray & Mueller, 2012).

Economic Variables: Economic elements, from inflation to interest rates, can shape the true cost of reconstruction. And broader economic events, like a global recession, can further influence a disaster’s impact on GDP growth. It’s essential to factor in these variables for a comprehensive economic assessment (Raddatz, 2009).

In short, while data is the core of our project, it’s important to recognize its shortcomings. Understanding these nuances and adapting our methodologies accordingly is key to having a meaningful analysis.

6. Future Directions: Linking Literature to Data Science

Long-Term Economic Impacts: While many studies capture the immediate fallout of disasters, the sustained economic effects, especially in frequently affected regions, are less explored. For our project, understanding these lasting impacts is key. By examining long-term economic patterns, we can better predict the cumulative effects of repeated disasters, aiding in strategic planning (Raddatz, 2009).

Evaluating Reconstruction Approaches: Different regions adopt varied post-disaster recovery methods. Which are the most cost-effective and resilient? By merging literature insights with our data, we can assess the success of these strategies, guiding future policy and refining our models on reconstruction costs and GDP implications (Kousky, 2014).

Integrating Socio-Economic Factors: The socio-economic context of a region influences its recovery path. Factors like income distribution, education, and community support can enhance our data models. Incorporating these elements will allow for more detailed predictions, leading to more targeted recovery strategies (Marcos et al., 2019).

In wrapping up, this literature review sets the stage for our data science journey. The insights from existing research will guide our methodologies, ensuring our project is academically sound and ready to address real-world challenges.

Conclusion: From Literature to Action

The intricate relationship between natural disasters and their economic repercussions has been a focal point of numerous studies over the past decades. The literature reviewed in this context offers a comprehensive understanding of how disaster characteristics, namely magnitude, scale, and frequency, influence economic outcomes, particularly GDP growth and reconstruction costs.

1. Disaster Magnitude and Scale: The intensity and spatial extent of disasters play a huge role in determining their immediate and long-term economic impacts. However, as highlighted by Mendelsohn et al. (2012), the relationship between disaster magnitude and economic damages is often non-linear, with factors like preparedness and infrastructure resilience modulating the outcomes.
2. Frequency of Disasters: Regions frequently hit by moderate disasters might experience compounding economic effects over time, sometimes surpassing the impacts of singular high-magnitude events. This insight, derived from Raddatz (2009), underscores the importance of considering both the intensity and recurrence of disasters in economic assessments.
3. Economic Damages and Reconstruction Costs: Direct metrics like reconstruction costs provide tangible measures of a disaster’s economic impact. However, as emphasized by Kousky (2014), indirect costs and long-term economic disruptions are equally significant and often overlooked.
4. Challenges in Data and Analysis: Ensuring data consistency across regions and disaster types, as well as accounting for external factors like geopolitical issues and inflation, are paramount for accurate economic impact assessments. These challenges, discussed in depth by Cavallo & Noy (2010), highlight the intricacies of disaster economics research.

This literature review has laid the groundwork, drawing from key academic sources to understand the economic impacts of climate-induced disasters. The complexity of these impacts, influenced by various factors, underscores the need for a data-driven approach to gain deeper insights.

Our upcoming data science project will build on this foundation. By analyzing the relationships between disaster characteristics and economic outcomes, we aim to provide actionable insights for policymakers, disaster response teams, and communities. The objective is clear: to use data and research to inform decisions in an era of increasing climate challenges.

In sum, this review is both a recap of our current understanding and a starting point for our data-driven exploration. As we face the realities of a changing climate, the blend of academic knowledge and data analysis offers a way forward, ensuring we’re informed and ready for the challenges ahead.

Bibliography

• Cavallo, E., & Noy, I. (2010). The economics of natural disasters: A survey. IDB Working Paper Series.
• Doocy, S., Daniels, A., Murray, S., & Kirsch, T. D. (2013). The human impact of earthquakes: a historical review of events 1980–2009 and systematic literature review. PLOS Currents Disasters.
• Emanuel, K. (2011). Global warming effects on U.S. hurricane damage. Weather, Climate, and Society, 3(4), 261–268.
• Gray, C., & Mueller, V. (2012). Natural disasters and population mobility in Bangladesh. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(16), 6000–6005.
• Grimmond, S. (2017). Urbanization and global environmental change: local effects of urban warming. Geographical Journal, 173(1), 83–88.
• Hallegatte, S., & Dumas, P. (2009). Can natural disasters have positive consequences? Investigating the role of embodied technical change. Ecological Economics, 68(3), 777–786.
• Hallegatte, S., Vogt-Schilb, A., Bangalore, M., & Rozenberg, J. (2017). Unbreakable: Building the resilience of the poor in the face of natural disasters. World Bank Publications.
• Hochrainer-Stigler, S., Mechler, R., & Pflug, G. (2018). Climate change and financial adaptation in Africa. Investigating the impact of climate change on the robustness of index-based microinsurance in Malawi. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 23(2), 231–250.
• Kellenberg, D. K., & Mobarak, A. M. (2008). Does rising income increase or decrease damage risk from natural disasters? Journal of Urban Economics, 63(3), 788–802.
• Kousky, C. (2014). Informing climate adaptation: A review of the economic costs of natural disasters. Energy Economics, 46, 576–592.
• Marcos, M., Amores, A., & Joaquim, P. (2019). Urbanization effects on local climate. Urban Climate, 27, 256–268.
• Mendelsohn, R., Emanuel, K., Chonabayashi, S., & Bakkensen, L. (2012). The impact of climate change on global tropical cyclone damage. Nature Climate Change, 2(3), 205–209.
• Raddatz, C. (2009). The wrath of God: Macroeconomic costs of natural disasters. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper.
• Smith, A. B., & Katz, R. W. (2013). US billion-dollar weather and climate disasters: data sources, trends, accuracy, and biases. Natural Hazards, 67(2), 387–410.
• Stott, P. A., Stone, D. A., & Allen, M. R. (2016). Human contribution to the European heatwave of 2003. Nature, 432(7017), 610–614.
• Visser, H., Petersen, A. C., & Ligtvoet, W. (2014). On the relation between weather-related disaster impacts, vulnerability and climate change. Climatic Change, 125(3–4), 461–477.