Advocacy’s Most Important Statistic

The Cost Per Personalized Legislator Communication is the Most Important Benchmark for Any Campaign

Mike Kondratick
Jul 20, 2017 · 3 min read

Engagement.

It’s a nebulous, catch-all word in the advocacy world.

It’s neither good nor bad. It’s a necessary component to any issue campaign.

But if you’re making an investment in a campaign, the word should still be a red flag.

Paying just to “create engagement” is like paying a chef to assemble the ingredients but not cook the meal.

Finding the right people to advocate for an issue is important. Just like finding the right ingredients for a meal. There are a few go-to audience mining tactics:

  • Care2 or Change.org
  • Facebook or Twitter ads
  • Display ads
  • Native ads

Depending on the backgrounds, experiences and locations of the people you need to find, you adjust your investments in these channels accordingly (the more specific the audience need, the higher the cost).

This investment yields an overall cost per acquisition. This cost is quoted liberally to help prove campaign efficacy; to show that you’ve efficiently “engaged” your audience. And, it’s important to a degree. You should make sure you’re spending efficiently to build a following.

But your cost per acquisition has the same relationship to the overall success of your campaign as the cost of the groceries does to how enjoyable your meal is. There’s not a correlation.

At this point, all you’ve done is find people who can potentially help you move a legislator’s opinion. The harder part is finding the people in this group who are willing to send personalized communications to a legislator.

Petition signatures, form emails, patch-through phone calls, likes and re-tweets, though they don’t have much of an impact on legislators, are effective at providing clues as to who these people are.

Those clues will help you with your hardest challenge — and your biggest campaign investment — developing relationships with these engaged advocates that motivate them to generate personal letters, phone calls and legislator meetings.

Every survey of the most effective legislator communications says that it’s these personal communications that make the difference. So then the cost to deliver them is the true cost of moving legislator opinions — the true cost of being successful.

That makes the cost per personalized legislator communication the most important metric of any advocacy campaign.

This cost, compared to an average cost of acquisition, will be high. Generating personalized communications to legislators isn’t efficient. You’ve got to factor-in all of the costs necessary to build advocate relationships: the emails, the calls, the Facebook conversations, etc. Some relationships take longer to develop than others. There’s no formula or template to follow. But it’s reasonable to assume that these relationships will take months to build. Then there’s the cost to create and deliver the personalized legislator communications themselves. Handwritten letters and in-person meetings take more time and money to generate.

You wouldn’t expect the cost of your meal to equal the cost of the groceries — the chef adds most of the value to create a memorable meal. So it is with advocacy. Most of the value is created after you’ve generated engagement. Invest your advocacy budget accordingly and make sure you’re tracking the most important metric.

How do you measure the cost-effectiveness of your advocacy campaigns?

)
Welcome to a place where words matter. On Medium, smart voices and original ideas take center stage - with no ads in sight. Watch
Follow all the topics you care about, and we’ll deliver the best stories for you to your homepage and inbox. Explore
Get unlimited access to the best stories on Medium — and support writers while you’re at it. Just $5/month. Upgrade